메뉴
BL
Wired AI • 29일 전

美 조지아 경찰, 플록 카메라로 전 애인 경찰 56회 추적

IMP
6/10
핵심 요약

미국 조지아주 앨파레타 경찰 소속 더스틴 보조 경관이 자동 번호판 인식 시스템(ALPR)인 Flock Safety를 3~5월 사이 전 연인인 동료 경찰관의 차량을 56회, 그녀와 자주 함께 있던 다른 경찰관의 차량을 29회 검색·추적한 사실이 내부 조사 문서로 확인됐습니다. 보조는 유급 정직 후 사임했으며 형사 조사가 진행 중입니다. 이는 경찰이 위치 추적 도구에 쉽게 접근할 수 있어 연인 감시 등 남용 위험이 크다는 점을 보여주는 사례로, 전국적으로 최소 45건의 유사 사건이 문서화된 상태입니다.

번역된 본문

최근 몇 달간 경찰관들이 Flock Safety가 판매하는 자동 번호판 인식 장치(ALPR)를 애인 추적 등에 남용했다는 보도가 급증했지만, 이러한 사건의 세부 내용은 흔히 알려지지 않았다. 이제 공공기록정보공개청구를 통해 확보한 문서를 통해 WIRED는 한 건의 광범위한 Flock 남용 감시 사례와 이후의 조사, 그리고 파장에 대한 구체적인 내용을 공개할 수 있게 되었다.

더스틴 보조(Dustin Bozzo)는 이번 달까지 조지아주 애틀랜타 인근 교외 도시인 앨파레타(Alpharetta)에서 순찰경찰로 근무했으며, 3월부터 5월 사이 과거 연인이었던 앨파레타 경찰서 동료의 번호판을 Flock으로 56회 검색한 혐의를 받고 있다. (문서에 따르면 이들 자체의 연애 관계도 시의 직장 내 연애 금지 규정을 위반한 것이었다.) 보조는 전 애인의 차가 다른 경찰관의 차 근처에 자주 있는 것을 알게 되자, 그 경찰관의 차량 검색도 시작했다. 같은 기간 동안 29회에 걸쳐 그랬다.

앨파레타 경찰서의 제이슨 히엇(Jason Hiott) 경감은 WIRED에 보조가 7월 20일 유급 정직 처리됐다가 내부 조사 후 8월 5일 사임했다고 밝혔다. 그는 또 해당 서의 형사부에서 '진행 중인 형사 조사'가 이뤄지고 있다고 덧붙였다. 앨파레타 경찰서의 트렌트 린드그렌(Trent Lindgren) 서장은 WIRED에 조사가 곧 마무리될 것으로 보이며, 경찰서는 '높은 기준'을 스스로에게 적용하고 남용이 확인되자 '즉각적인 조치'를 취했다고 말했다. Flock은 코멘트 요청에 응답하지 않았다. 보조 역시 여러 차례의 코멘트 요청에 응답하지 않았으며, WIRED가 페이스북으로 메시지를 보낸 뒤 프로필 사진과 이름을 변경했다.

일반인의 세계에서는 이별 후 옛 연인의 소셜미디어 프로필을 들여다보고 싶은 유혹이 있을 수 있다. 하지만 경찰의 세계에서는 많은 경찰관이 Flock—사람의 위치를 추적하는 강력하고 정보가 풍부하며 침해적인 도구—에 즉시 접근할 수 있다. 전국적으로 경찰관들이 현재 또는 과거 연인을 조회하거나 추적하기 위해 Flock을 남용한 사건이 최소 45건 문서화되어 있다.

앨파레타 경찰서 재바 브레이스웨이트(Jabbar Braithwaite) 경사가 작성한 전체 내부 보고서를 포함한 문서에 따르면, 보조는 위협이나 해를 가할 의도로 Flock을 사용하지 않았다고 주장했다. 그러나 문서가 묘사하는 사건의 전개 과정은, 그런 경우에도 이 기술의 남용이 빠르고 쉽게 심각한 위법으로 확대될 수 있음을 보여준다.

내부 보고서에 따르면 보조는 브레이스웨이트에게 2025년 말 당시 동료 경찰관과 연인 관계를 맺었음을 인정했다. (해당 경찰관은 현재 경찰서의 일반 직원으로 근무 중이다.) 상대방 경찰관은 로맨틱한 대화가 대부분 스냅챗(Snapchat)에서 이뤄졌다고 주장했다. 관계가 근무 시간 중 얼마나 지속되었는지는 불분명하다. 문서에 따르면 보조는 그 전 경찰관과 '연인 관계였던 적이 있느냐'는 최초 질문에 '근무 중에 말인가요?'라고 반문했다. 브레이스웨이트는 '질문을 명확히 하기 위해 같이 근무했을 때든 그 외의 때든 그와 [편집됨]이 성적 관계를 가졌는지 물었다'고 썼다. '보조 순찰경은 그랬다고 답했다.' 전 경찰관 역시 성적 관계가 있었음을 인정했지만, 두 사람 모두 근무 중에는 절대 그런 일이 없었다고 주장했다.

그럼에도 두 사람의 행동은 경찰서 내 여러 사람의 주의를 끌었다. 문서에 따르면 다수의 사람들이 보조와 해당 경찰관이 '근무 중 개인 시간을 자주 함께 보냈으며' 그동안 '맡은 업무를 수행하지 않았다'고 신고했다. 이러한 신고로 경찰서는 같은 분대와 순찰 구역에 배속되어 있던 두 경찰관을 분리하고 '직장 내 적절한 상호작용'에 관한 '서면 지시'를 발부했다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Comment Loader Save Story Save this story Comment Loader Save Story Save this story In recent months, there has been a surge in reports of police officers misusing automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) sold by Flock Safety to stalk former romantic partners—but details about these incidents are often scarce. Now, with documents obtained via a public records request, WIRED can reveal specific details about one extensive Flock-fueled surveillance campaign and the subsequent investigation and fallout. Dustin Bozzo, who until this month worked as a patrolman in the Atlanta-area suburb of Alpharetta, Georgia, allegedly used Flock 56 times between March and May to search for the license plate of a former romantic partner—a fellow member of the Alpharetta Police Department. (Their relationship itself violated the city’s ban on workplace dating, documents show.) When Bozzo noticed that his ex’s car was often near that of another police officer, he began searching for that officer’s vehicle as well. He did so 29 times between March and May. Lieutenant Jason Hiott of the Alpharetta Police Department tells WIRED that Bozzo was placed on paid leave on July 20 and resigned on August 5 following an internal investigation. He adds that an “ongoing criminal investigation” is underway in the department's Criminal Investigations Division. Alpharetta police chief Trent Lindgren tells WIRED that the investigation will likely be finished soon, adding that the department holds itself to a “high standard,” and took “immediate action” when misuse was identified. Flock did not respond to a request for comment. Bozzo did not respond to multiple requests for comment. He changed his Facebook profile picture and name after WIRED messaged him on the platform. In the civilian world, a breakup may tempt people to check up on their former lovers by pulling up their social media profiles. But in the police world, many officers have instant access to Flock—a powerful, informative, and invasive tool for tracking people’s locations. Across the country, there have been at least 45 documented incidents of police officers misusing Flock in order to look up or track current or former romantic partners. According to the documents—which include the full internal report written by Alpharetta police Sergeant Jabbar Braithwaite—Bozzo says that he didn’t use Flock with the intent to intimidate or cause harm. The sequence of events they describe nonetheless show that even in such a case, the misuse of this technology can quickly and easily escalate into a serious offense. Per the internal report, Bozzo admitted to Braithwaite that he had a fling with a then-fellow officer that started in late 2025. (That officer is now a civilian employee of the department.) The other officer, for her part, claimed that most, if not all of their romantic communications happened on Snapchat. It’s unclear how much of the relationship may have played out during work hours. Bozzo, upon first being asked if he “had ever been romantically involved” with the former officer, responded by asking, "At work?" according to the documents. “To clarify the question, I asked whether, at any time, either while employed together or otherwise, he and [redacted] had engaged in a sexual relationship,” Braithwaite wrote. “Patrolman Bozzo responded that they had.” The former officer also admitted that they had been sexually intimate, but both maintained that it never occurred while they were on duty. Nevertheless, their behavior had caught the attention of multiple people within the department. According to the documents, multiple people reported that Bozzo and the other officer “frequently spent personal time together while on duty” and were “not engaged in their assigned responsibilities” while doing so. The reports prompted the police department to separate the officers, who had been assigned to the same squad and patrol beat, and issue them a “written directive” about “acceptable workplace interactions.” However, the officers seemingly continued the affair. One sergeant reported that he saw the pair meeting in a “dark, secluded park,” per Braithwaite’s summary, at about 2:30 am while Officer Bozzo was on duty but the other officer was not. Bozzo claimed that the fling lasted approximately one month, and that their eventual breakup was mutual—though the other officer claimed that the relationship lasted several months, and that she initiated the breakup. Both said that it had ended on good terms. It’s unclear exactly when the relationship ended, but Bozzo’s Flock searches for her vehicle began in early March. Citing Flock audit logs, Braithwaite claims that when Flock’s system would prompt Bozzo to specify the reason for each query, he almost always selected either “Wanted Person” or “Traffic Infraction." “When asked why he routinely selected those categories, Patrolman Bozzo explained that doing so was ‘just a quick keystroke,’” Braithwaite wrote. Got a Tip? Are you a current or former police officer, government official, or Flock Safety employee who wants to talk about the company? We’d like to hear from you. Using a nonwork phone or computer, contact the reporters securely on Signal at carolinehaskins.61. Bozzo claimed that he was trying to make sure that the officer had arrived home safely, claiming she often drove around late at night. He began searching her uncle’s license plate after learning that she got into a car accident and was borrowing his car, the documents show. Between April 5 and April 14, he searched for the uncle’s vehicle 18 times. At some point, while reviewing the search results, Bozzo claimed that he began noticing a particular vehicle that was often in close proximity to her. The car belonged to an Alpharetta Police Department officer who recently transferred from a nearby police department. Bozzo claims he found the search results “weird,” prompting him to start searching the officer’s vehicle. Though Bozzo denied being motivated by jealousy, he knew the officer personally: They had both helped the Alpharetta officer when she was moving. (Both men corroborated this claim.) Bozzo’s former romantic partner, upon being interviewed by Braithwaite, claimed that she didn’t know what motivated Bozzo to search for the vehicles she and the other officer were driving. Both she and the other officer insisted that they had always been platonic friends. The other officer, for his part, told investigators that his interactions with Bozzo had been friendly and respectful. Bozzo told Alpharetta investigators that he understood that his actions were wrong, and Braithwaite did not find any evidence to undermine his claim that he hadn’t acted with “malice or an intent to harm.” However, Braithwaite ultimately told Bozzo that “regardless of his stated motivation,” his use of Flock was “inconsistent with Department policy and the authorized use of the system.”