메뉴
HN
Hacker News 28일 전

미국 귀리 공급망의 변화와 '귀리 마피아'의 도전

IMP
5/10
핵심 요약

오트밀크의 인기로 미국 내 귀리 수요가 증가하자, 중서부 농부들은 기존 캐나다 의존 공급망을 깨고 자체 가공 공장을 짓고 있습니다. 이는 정책과 수익성 문제로 쇠퇴했던 미국 귀리 산업이 수십 년 만에 맞이한 중대한 전환점입니다. 과거 공급망이 어떻게 붕괴하고 재편되었는지 이해하는 것이 향후 시장 변화의 핵심입니다.

번역된 본문

'귀리 마피아(Oat Mafia)'가 미국의 귀리 인프라를 재편하려 한다는 헤드라인이 보도된 가운데, 한 작가가 최근 과거의 사례를 통해 몇 가지 교훈을 공유한다. 수십 년 만에 소박한 곡물인 귀리의 시장이 변화하고 있다. 옥수수나 콩 같이 수익성이 높고 다작이 가능한 농작물에 밀려 오랫동안 외면받았던 귀리는, 오트밀크(귀리 우유)의 인기에 힘입어 수요가 증가하고 있다. 미네소타주에서 Green Acres Milling이 새로운 귀리 가공 공장을 짓고 있으며, 이는 미국 내에서 수십 년 만에 처음으로 건설되는 공장이다. 이 프로젝트는 미국 중서부 상단의 농부들로 구성된 이른바 '귀리 마피아'가 기획한 것이다.

에이미 롤린스(Aimee Rawlins)의 보도에 따르면, 중서부 농부들의 옥수수-콩 윤작 시스템에 귀리를 추가하면 잡초를 관리하고 질산염 오염을 줄이며, 폭등하는 투입 비용의 변동성으로부터 농부들을 보호할 수 있다. 농부들에게 이점은 명확하지만, 그들이 직접 공장을 짓고 있는 이유는 귀리를 판매하는 것이 여전히 고된 싸움이기 때문이다. 원유를 식품 회사가 사용하는 중간 제품으로 가공하는 기존 귀리 공장들은 현재 필요한 귀리를 전적으로 캐나다에서 수입해 충당하고 있다. 오늘날 미국인들이 먹는 오버나이트 오트와 그래놀라는 대부분 캐나다 대초원에서 수확된 귀리를 기차나 트럭으로 저렴하게 운송해 미국 공장에서 가공한 것이다.

하지만 미국의 귀리 공장이 항상 캐나다에서 수백만 부셸의 저렴하고 고품질인 귀리를 수입했던 것은 아니다. 필자의 삼촌인 토마스 매뉴얼(Thomas Manuel)은 1970년대 초 미니애폴리스에서 공장을 운영했으며, 당시에는 모든 귀리를 미국 내 농부들로부터 구매했다. 필자의 아버지인 케리 매뉴얼(Kerry Manuel)은 형을 따라 곡물 사업에 뛰어들어 30년 동안 귀리 중개인으로 일했으며, 귀리를 가진 사람과 필요로 하는 기업을 연결해 주었다. 그는 지난 세기 귀리 시장이 극적으로 변화했던 시기에 핵심적인 역할을 담당했다. 미국과 캐나다의 농업 정책에 대응하여, 필자의 아버지와 동료들은 미국 농부들이 재배를 중단한 귀리를 대체할 캐나다 산 귀리를 들여오는 공급망을 구축했다.

오늘날 귀리 시장의 변화가 영구적일지 일시적일지는 시간이 말해줄 것이다. 하지만 현재의 공급망에 진입하거나 이를 해체하고자 하는 농부들은 40년 전 시장이 왜 변했었는지, 그리고 왜 이 공급망이 그토록 탄력적으로 유지되어 왔는지를 이해하는 것이 현명할 것이다.

  • 파산이 어떻게 진행되는지를 설명하는 유명한 말처럼 - '서서히, 그리고 갑자기' - 미국 내 귀리의 쇠퇴는 20세기 동안 미국 농장을 변화시킨 점진적인 움직임으로 시작되었고, 1980년대 농업 정책으로 인해 급격히 가속화되었다. 1950년 이후, 트럭과 트랙터가 농장용 동물을 대체하면서 귀리 재배 면적은 수십 년간 하락세를 보였다. 우수한 제초제의 등장으로 농부들은 잡초 방지를 위해 윤작용으로 귀리를 심을 필요가 없어졌다. 무엇보다도 농부들은 옥수수, 밀, 콩을 재배하는 것이 더 많은 돈을 벌 수 있음을 깨달았다. 1990년 미국 농무부(USDA) 보고서는 이러한 변화를 다음과 같이 요약했다. "콩과 옥수수는 옥수수 벨트(Corn Belt) 전역에 걸쳐 귀리를 대체했습니다. 이는 콩과 옥수수의 수익 잠재력이 더 크고, 가축 사육에서 현금 작물 재배로의 전환이 이루어졌음을 반영합니다."

연방 농업 정책은 귀리의 장기적인 쇠퇴에 속도를 더했다. 일리노이 대학교 가드너 농업 정책 프로그램(Gardner Agriculture Policy Program)의 총장이자 '농업 정책의 단층: 농장 법안의 입법적, 정치적 역사'의 저자인 조나단 코페스(Jonathan Coppess)는 필자에게 귀리는 "옥수수, 밀, 면화 같은 주요 작물에 비해 항상 부수적인 생각에 불과했다"고 말했다. 농업 정책은 농부들에게 귀리 대신 다른 작물로 전환하도록 강력한 유인책을 제공했다. 1950년 이후, 트럭과 트랙터가 농장용 동물을 대체하면서 귀리 재배 면적은 수십 년간 하락세를 보였다. 우수한 제초제의 등장으로 농부들은 잡초 방지를 위해 윤작용으로 귀리를 심을 필요가 없어졌다. 코페스에 따르면, 1960년대의 비상 사료 보조금은 "기본적으로 농부들에게 귀리 생산을 중단하도록 돈을 지불한 것이나 다름없었다"고 한다. 1970년대 당시 농무부 장관 얼 부츠(Earl Butz)가 농부들에게 "커지든지 아니면 꺼지든지(get big or get out)"라고 말했던 시기의 확장 이후, 시장은 결국 붕괴를 맞이했다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
In the wake of headlines about the “Oat Mafia” attempting to disrupt America’s oat infrastructure, one writer shares some lessons from the recent past. For the first time in decades, the market is changing for the humble oat. Long overlooked in favor of more profitable and prolific row crops like corn and soybeans, demand for oats is growing, thanks in part to the popularity of oat milk . In Minnesota, Green Acres Milling is building a new oat mill, the U.S.’s first new mill in decades. It’s the brainchild of a cadre of upper Midwest farmers colloquially known as the “Oat Mafia.” Read Next Farmers Aren’t Keeping Up With Oat Milk Demand The Unexpected Rise of the Oat Mafia Maslins, a Method of Planting Grains You’ve Probably Never Heard of As Aimee Rawlins reported , adding oats to Midwestern farmers’ corn-and-beans rotation can manage weeds, cut down on nitrate pollution, and cushion farmers against the whipsaw of volatile input prices. The benefits for farmers are obvious, but they are building their own mill because selling oats has been a struggle. Existing oat mills, which process raw oats into intermediate products used by food companies, currently get all the oats they need by importing them from Canada. Today, Americans’ overnight oats and granola mostly come from oats harvested on the Canadian prairies and cheaply shipped to U.S. mills by train or truck. America’s oat mills didn’t always import millions of bushels of cheap, high-quality oats from Canada, however. My uncle, Thomas Manuel, ran a Minneapolis mill in the early 1970s that purchased all their oats from U.S. farmers. My dad, Kerry Manuel, followed his brother into the grain business and worked 30 years as an oats broker, connecting people who had oats with companies that needed them. He played a key role the last time the oat market changed dramatically. Responding to agricultural policies in the U.S. and Canada, my dad and others created a supply chain to replace oats that American farmers quit growing with oats from Canada. Time will tell whether changes in today’s oat market are long-lasting or ephemeral. But farmers hoping to break into — or break apart — the current supply chain would be wise to understand why the market changed 40 years ago and why the supply chain has proven so resilient. * Like the saying about how you go bankrupt — slowly, then all at once — the decline of oats in the United States began with gradual changes that transformed American farms during the 20th century and then accelerated quickly in the 1980s due to agricultural policy. After 1950, oat acreage began a decades-long slide as trucks and tractors replaced farm animals. Better herbicides meant farmers didn’t need oats in the rotation for weed control. Most importantly, farmers could make more money growing corn, wheat, or soybeans. A 1990 USDA report summarized the shift: “Soybeans and corn have replaced oats throughout much of the Corn Belt, reflecting both the greater profit potential for soybeans and corn and a shift from livestock to cash grain farming.” Federal agricultural policy accelerated oats’ long decline. Oats “were always an afterthought” in agricultural policy compared to “the big players — corn, wheat, and cotton,” Jonathan Coppess told me. Coppess is director of the Gardner Agriculture Policy Program at the University of Illinois and author of The Fault Lines of Farm Policy: A Legislative and Political History of the Farm Bill . Agricultural policies created strong incentives for farmers to shift fields from oats to other crops. After 1950, oat acreage began a decades-long slide as trucks and tractors replaced farm animals. Better herbicides meant farmers didn’t need oats in the rotation for weed control. The emergency feed grants of the 1960s were “basically paying farmers to take oats out of production,” Coppess said. Expansion during the 1970s — the era when Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz told farmers to “ get big or get out ” — was followed by collapse in the 1980s. “Once you get to the 80s,” Coppess said, “it’s locked in at that point. We just cannibalize within agriculture and narrow it more and more to the major crops.” Oats were not a major crop. Payment-in-kind programs and the 1985 Farm Bill were the nail in the coffin for U.S. oat acreage. That year’s Farm Bill included the Conservation Reserve Program , which paid farmers to take marginal acres out of production. Often, the idled acres were those that had been planted with oats. The cumulative effect of these policies erased oats from Midwestern farms. Each year from 1950 to 1987, the acreage U.S. farmers collectively planted in oats declined by an average of 712,763 acres per year. “The U.S. Farm Bill basically killed U.S. oat production,” said Randy Strychar, an oat industry analyst . “The loan rates were never favorable for oats. It was a small crop that had no real significant lobby group.” * Yet food companies like Quaker and General Mills still needed oats. They found them in Canada. Bill Wilton, a Manitoba oat farmer, remembers when the American oat millers arrived in the early 1980s: “They came to Canada and they were really surprised and pleased with the quality and the volume of oats they found.” Oats hate heat and thrived in Canada’s cooler climate. Canada’s “oat growing regions basically are north of a line between Winnipeg and Calgary,” Wilton said. “There’s some terrific oat crops growing in the Peace River region of Alberta, which is getting very, very far north.” It’s a landscape that stretches from the flat Red River valley of southern Manitoba to the rolling hills and grasslands of Saskatchewan and Alberta. Before the 1980s, Wilton said, oats were “a very minor crop” for Canadian farmers. In that era, all grain harvested on Canada’s prairies was marketed by the Canadian Wheat Board . “The Wheat Board didn’t make much of an effort to promote and sell oats,” Wilton said. “They were true to their name. They were in the wheat and barley business.” “They came to Canada and they were really surprised and pleased with the quality and the volume of oats they found.” Strychar was born in the United States but moved to Canada to play hockey. By the 1980s, he had a front-row seat for the changing geography of the North American oats market while working for a branch of the Wheat Board. “Canadian farms are very nimble,” Strychar said. With the decline in U.S. oat acreage, Canadian farmers “just started growing more oats because they could sell volume.” Demand for oats increased in the 1980s when researchers announced that beta glucan, a type of fiber in oats, can lower cholesterol . While U.S. agricultural policies squeezed oats out of American fields, Canadian policies opened the door for farmers to grow more oats for their neighbors to the South. First, Canada and the United States signed a historic free trade agreement in 1988. “When that came in,” Strychar said, “all the tariffs dropped and that meant Canada could now export raw oats or oat products to the United States quite freely.” Second, in 1989 the Canadian Wheat Board shifted control of oats from the government to the free market, an opening move in Canadian agriculture’s shift from government control to market-oriented policies. * Connecting Canada’s oat supply with U.S. mills was where my dad entered the story. In the early 1980s, he was trading barley for a small Minneapolis firm and saw how U.S. farm programs were driving oat acreage down. “You knew you were going to keep losing acreage, the natural place to go was Canada,” he said. There was a fierce scramble among traders to make money bringing Canadian oats into the U.S. “I ran my competitors out of business by outworking them,” my dad said (perhaps still trying to impart lessons to his middle-aged son). After the trading day ended, traders would head to a bar near the Minneapolis Grain Exchange and trade until 11:00 pm. “Huge egos,” my dad said, “they’d get a few beers in them and they’d buy