프라이드 도서 전시 거부한 도서관들, "비판하지 말라"

This story was reported with support from the MuckRock foundation . Around this time last year, Rachel Rodman was happily employed as a library clerk and program assistant with the Crawford County Library District in the east-central part of Missouri. Rodman didn’t think anything of the display she curated for Pride month last June, highlighting LGBTQ+ books from the district’s collection in the one room library within a community center. Rodman says she was given free reign to create displays and had no reason to suspect that her actions would lead to her firing. The display was up for five days before Rodman says her branch manager left her a handwritten note telling her to remove it. Rodman refused, posting to Facebook on June 5, 2025 that she wouldn’t deny a marginalized group’s right to visibility because the district feared community backlash. “I take my job very seriously,” Rodman wrote, adding, “I will not yield, and I’m not sorry about it.” The next day, she was fired. Public records obtained by 404 Media offer insight into Rodman’s dismissal and how the decision reflected poorly on the library. It represents one of hundreds of public records requests filed in jurisdictions in which we’ve received a tip or followed up on incidents of censorship and self-censorship related to LGBTQ+ focused or Pride-related book displays. Records from a handful of public libraries show a willingness from library leadership to tolerate acts of self-censorship in anticipation of unwanted attention from certain community members, and in some cases, religious leaders. This tends to show up in hesitancy to organize cultural heritage programming and LGBTQ+ book displays. In a statement to 404 Media, Rodman says that because public libraries are funded through taxpayer dollars, reducing visibility of a marginalized group constitutes a refusal to openly support all patrons. “It’s never enough to just carry the books as available material,” Rodman told 404 Media. “Everyone deserves and should be able to find themselves publicly represented, but especially in communities where censorship is already such a huge issue. It’s in those communities that minorities of any kind already feel repressed and underrepresented.” In one email exchange from libraries in east-central Missouri, Crawford County Library District’s director told other area library directors that the firing “was not discrimination,” but rather, to “protect” employees and patrons. The situation “does look bad,” she wrote, before making it worse by accusing the employee of playing “victim.” The issue, according to Rodman and the records, was that in 2022, the library tried to host a “Rainbow Storytime” event, but canceled it because the library had received death threats. “Regardless of whether the library actually instructed the employee to remove the display, we’re in rural Missouri,” Steven Campbell, director of the Scenic Regional Library in Union, Missouri, wrote. “It’s an extremely challenging political and social environment. We all need to make our own decisions. Not everyone has a Board or appointing authority that will back them on LGBT issues. If someone thinks losing their job or receiving deaths over a display is worth it, that’s great. I admire them. Not everyone is willing to make those sacrifices, and that shouldn’t be judged.” Censorship experts and professional associations disagree, but they acknowledge that small and rural libraries have different challenges than their metro-area counterparts. A lot of these systems are very small, with very few salaried staff and limited acquisition budgets. Nor are they discounting the fact that it’s hard to be a librarian right now, thanks in large part to the work of some very well-funded astroturfers. The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom found that in 2025, over 90 percent of all book challenges could be linked to pressure groups or key decision-makers like public officials and government employees or library boards or library administrators. “When a library chooses to engage in censorship-lite out of fear, by just trying to keep the peace and but still do the good work of the library, it’s the patrons who pay the price, no matter what” Kate Laughlin, executive director of the National Association for Rural and Small Libraries, told 404 Media. “It is the community who is the victim, not the library and the librarians.” In public records obtained by 404 Media, librarians regularly discussed the challenges they face with their leadership. Some of the things we've read include: "I am not calling attention to Pride Month online, but I don't call attention to other recognized holidays unless it is part of a program... each time that I promote this piece of the collection I have push back from a parent." "If it is in the children's area, maybe a good compromise would be to move it to another area." "I have made a compromise by taking the time and trouble of changing the wording on the sign that she disapproved... I want to keep the Pride Month display up where it is for 10 more business days. Pride Month ends on June 30 and then it will be taken down." “Everyone knows the stuff we’re dealing with regarding LGBT issues. It’s no cakewalk for anyone.” “As a library director in a small town I have had apprehensions about doing outward pride displays in my community.” “My assumption is that we will get more complaints as Pride month gets underway.” The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom is seeing fewer public Pride displays in libraries this year compared to recent years, citing the chilling effect of censorship. “There is no obligation to have any display about anything,” Sarah Lamdan, executive director of the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom told 404 Media. “It’s all about what a community is interested in. But if somebody thinks that a Pride display might be something that would be appreciated by any member of their community, or they want to put up a Pride display, that shouldn’t be a source of fear or incrimination.” Lamdan says there’s a difference between being a library that doesn’t do displays of any kind, and libraries that have done displays in the past who choose not to do them due to external pressure. One underexplored throughline here involves religious influence in local politics. CatholicVote, a political action committee that coordinates “Hide the Pride” campaigns since 2022, has donated to library defunding campaigns . Over the years, there have been a number of pastors challenging LGBTQ+ collections and displays . Take for instance, an incident that happened in June 2024 in which a local pastor checked out dozens of books from those collections and posted on social media for his congregants to do the same. Emails obtained by 404 Media from the time of the incident show library workers from neighboring systems who had LGBTQ+ titles wrapped up in the “Hide the Pride”-style incident wishing the library hadn’t drawn further attention to the issue through its Facebook channel . “Personally, I think Wichita’s decision to call attention to this on Facebook was a bad idea,” Tom Taylor, director of the Andover Public Library, said in one email to other cc’d library workers. “It just gives more people the idea.” When asked for clarification as to what he meant by “bad idea,” Taylor told 404 Media that states like Kansas have patron privacy laws that protect everyone—including religious leaders—from public borrowing disclosure. He also said that the Andover Public Library doesn’t have any Pride-specific events planned this year, but the library has signs that help users locate frequently challenged books. Taylor said that he believes challenged books should still be available to check out, even if they aren’t promoted within the library. “If you don’t order [the book] because you don’t want to have a controversy, that’s what we call censorship by omission,” he added. “To avoid buying them b