Geiger – 내 컴퓨터의 모든 AI 에이전트와 접근 권한을 한눈에 보기

geiger A Geiger counter for AI agents. One read-only command that inventories every AI agent, harness, MCP server, plugin, and AI extension on a machine — and tells you, in plain language, what each one can touch. npx geiger-scan No install. No account. No telemetry. Reads configs and directories, writes nothing (unless you ask for --json yourfile.json ). Why this exists In August 2026, an open-source agent harness went from zero to 200,000+ GitHub stars in three weeks. Its plugin ecosystem passed 13,000 repositories in the same window. One-click desktop clients appeared the same day it launched. Instagram carousels now teach office workers to install all of it. Every one of those installs is a program that can execute commands, read files, and hold credentials — configured in dotfiles nobody looks at twice. Ask yourself the question this tool answers: what is actually running on this machine, and what can it reach? Most people cannot answer it. Now it's one command. What a scan looks like GEIGER · a Geiger counter for AI agents machine dev-laptop · 2026-09-06 12:24 UTC · read-only · no telemetry ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── 9 findings across 3 ecosystems · 7 can execute code · 1 credential in config files claude-code (6) Claude Code agent [EXECUTES] [BROAD-FILESYSTEM] [NETWORK] origin: registry · @anthropic-ai/claude-code magic (Claude Code · global) MCP server [EXECUTES] [HOLDS-SECRETS] [BROAD-FILESYSTEM] origin: registry · @21st-dev/magic@latest credential: "API_KEY" — opaque value under a credential-named key · ~/.claude.json note: wrapped by a policy agent (domainguard-agent.exe) — enforcement layer in front of the server hooks: UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse hook [EXECUTES] note: hooks execute without a prompt each time their event fires ... Real output from a real machine (values redacted — see below). What it detects Ecosystem What geiger reads Claude Code global + per-project MCP servers, hooks, plugins, skills, subagents, apiKeyHelper MCP hosts Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code (user + project), Cline, Roo Code, Continue, Zed Other agents Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Aider, OpenCode, Qwen Code, DeepSeek Harness, Continue, GitHub Copilot CLI, Goose, Open Interpreter, LM Studio, Ollama Editor extensions AI extensions in VS Code / Insiders / Cursor Global CLIs agent packages in global npm roots (read directly — npm is never executed) Browser extensions AI extensions in Chrome / Edge / Brave profiles, with their manifest permissions Every finding gets: what it is, where it came from (registry, store, git, local script, remote server — or UNKNOWN-ORIGIN ), what it can do ( EXECUTES , HOLDS-SECRETS , BROAD-FILESYSTEM , BROAD-WEB , NETWORK ), and the evidence path so you can verify by hand. Geiger also recognizes policy wrappers (agents that put an enforcement layer in front of MCP servers) and reports both layers instead of hiding the real server behind the wrapper. The three promises Read-only. The only write geiger ever performs is the --json file you explicitly name. No telemetry. Nothing leaves your machine. There is no endpoint to send anything to. (This also means we have no idea how many people use this — a trade we're happy with.) Secrets by shape only. When a credential-shaped value is found in a config, geiger reports the key name, the file, and what kind of secret it looks like — never any part of the value. A redaction pass runs on all output as defense-in-depth, and the test suite enforces it. Usage npx geiger-scan scan, print the report npx geiger-scan --html report.html self-contained HTML report with per-finding "what to do" remediation guidance npx geiger-scan --json out.json machine-readable findings (schemaVersion 1) npx geiger-scan --path D:\repo1 --path E:\repo2 also scan these project directories for project-level agent and MCP configs npx geiger-scan --home C:\Users\other scan a different home root (another user profile, a mounted image) npx geiger-scan --strict exit 2 if anything can execute code or holds secrets npx geiger-scan --diff baseline.json compare against an earlier --json snapshot: what appeared, disappeared, or escalated since then Drift alarm: once you've reviewed a machine, save a baseline ( --json baseline.json ) and put geiger-scan --strict --diff baseline.json in cron or CI. It exits 2 only when something new can execute code or hold secrets — the standing, already-reviewed inventory stays quiet. Same mental model as a lockfile: accept what's there, alarm on change. No npm? npx github:Atomburstofficial/geiger runs straight from the repo. What the reports look like Before running anything, see exactly what you'd get: a sample HTML report and a sample JSON output live in this repo, generated from the test fixture — synthetic data, generic paths, credentials shown by shape only (as always). The HTML report: Every finding that warrants action carries plain-language remediation — as fix: lines in the terminal and "What to do" blocks in the HTML report. Fleet pattern (MSPs, IT): run with --json per machine on a schedule (an RMM task or login script writing %COMPUTERNAME%.json to a share), keep each machine's baseline, and let --diff report per-machine drift. The schema is versioned and stable. Geiger never phones home — the JSON files travel only where you put them. Limitations Stated up front, because a scanner you overtrust is worse than no scanner: Geiger reads known config locations . Agents installed in nonstandard paths, other user accounts, containers, or WSL (from the Windows side) are not seen. It reads configuration, not runtime behavior . It cannot tell you what a plugin actually did — only what its position allows. It cannot judge whether a package is malicious — only where it came from and what it can reach. Origin ≠ trustworthiness. Partially-parseable formats (TOML configs) are scanned by shape and flagged with reduced confidence rather than skipped. The ecosystem this tool audits changes weekly. Detectors are data-driven and small on purpose — see CONTRIBUTING.md to add one. FAQ Is this a security audit? No. It's an inventory with honest exposure labels — the thing you need before any audit means anything. Why should I trust a security company's free scanner? Read it. It's a few hundred lines of dependency-free JavaScript, and what's published is what runs — releases are published from GitHub Actions with npm provenance , so the npm page carries a signed link to the exact public commit each version was built from. What do I do about what it finds? Individually: remove what you don't recognize, rotate credentials that shouldn't be sitting in configs. At a company: that's policy enforcement, which is a different product — DomainGuard is how organizations put a policy layer in front of this surface. Geiger stays free and standalone either way. License MIT · built by Atomburst · zero runtime dependencies, no build step — the source you read is the code that runs.