메뉴
BL
Wired AI 50일 전

알렉스 빈드만, 트럼프 보복 딛고 상원의원 도전

IMP
6/10
핵심 요약

2019년 트럼프 대통령의 첫 탄핵 재판에서 핵심 증인으로 나섰던 알렉스 빈드만(Alex Vindman) 전 미국 국가안보회의(NSC) 국장이 올해 미국 상원의원 선거(플로리다주)에 출마했습니다. 그는 최근 인터뷰에서 자신의 군 경력과 트럼프 행정부의 보복을 이겨낸 과정, 그리고 국가 안보 관점에서 바라본 인공지능(AI) 기술의 중요성 등에 대해 밝혔습니다.

번역된 본문

댓글 로더 스토리 저장 이 스토리 저장 댓글 로더 스토리 저장 이 스토리 저장

알렉스 빈드만은 도널드 트럼프 대통령을 분노하게 만드는 법에 대해 몇 가지 알고 있다. 2019년, 빈드만은 트럼프의 첫 탄핵 재판에서 증인으로 출석하면서 전국적인 주목을 받았다. 만약 그 스캔들이 무엇이었는지 기억나지 않는다면, 그것은 트럼프, 우크라이나의 볼로디미르 젤렌스키 대통령, 바이든 가족 등이 연루된 사건이며, 당시 국가안보회의(NSC) 유럽 담당 국장이었던 빈드만이 문제가 된 통화를 엿들은 사건이다. 그 중요한 통화에 대해 의회에서 증언한 빈드만의 발언은 널리 찬사를 받았지만, 동시에 그의 빛나는 군 경력을 끝나게 했다. NSC에서 쫓겨난 후, 빈드만은 2020년 육군에서 퇴역했다.

6년이 지난 지금, 그는 정부의 다른 직책을 노리고 있다. 올해 1월, 빈드만은 마코 루비오가 previously 맡았던 미국 상원의원 플로리다주 의석을 놓고 공화당 현직인 애슐리 무디에게 도전하겠다고 발표했다. 2023년에 아내가 정치를 피하고 싶어 플로리다로 이사했다고 말하는 빈드만은 11월 중간선거를 앞두고 인터뷰를 진행하는 최신 후보자이다. 그가 나와 <와이어드(WIRED)>에게 특별히 흥미로운 이유는 몇 가지가 있다. 빈드만은 트럼프의 보복 기계를 겪고 그 속에서 살아남았으며, 나는 그 여정에 대해 더 듣고 싶었다. 또한 그는 우리가 자주 다루는 주제인 이란 전쟁과 이민세관단속국(ICE) 모두에 강하게 반대해 왔으며, 오랜 군 복무 경력자로서 국가 안보의 관점에서 바라본 인공지능(AI)에 대한 그의 견해를 듣고 싶었다. 게다가 겉보기에 공화당의 텃밭인 곳에서 출마하는 빈드만이 승리할 가능성이 꽤 높다는 점도 있다. 무디 상원의원이 여론조사에서 여전히 앞서고 있지만, 빈드만은 종이 한 장 차이로 뒤처져 있다. 불과 5개월 전에 선거 운동을 시작한 초선 출마자에게 결코 쉬운 일이 아니다.

이 인터뷰는 길이와 명확성을 위해 편집되었다.

케이티 드럼몬드: 알렉스, 빅 인터뷰에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 알렉스 빈드만: 감사합니다. 케이티, 여기 있게 되어 기쁩니다.

초대해 주셔서 정말 반갑습니다. 당신은 국가적 차원에서는 내부 고발자로 가장 잘 알려져 있지만, 20년 이상 복무한 육군 참전 용사이기도 합니다. 이라크에서 부상한 후 훈장을 받았고, 국가안보회의(NSC)에서 활동하기도 했죠. 트럼프 대통령의 첫 탄핵 재판에서의 당신의 역할이 당신의 업무와 경력을 가렸다고 느끼는지 궁금합니다. 어떤 모습으로 가장 기억되고 싶습니까?

제가 <커브 유어 엔수지애즘(Curb Your Enthusiasm)>에 출연한 것으로 가장 잘 알려져 있다고 말할 줄 알았습니다. 많은 분들이 거기서 저를 알아보시더라고요. 물론 대중은 [탄핵] 맥락에서 저를 압니다. 저는 그 파급력을 반드시 인식하지 못했습니다. 의회 앞에 앉아 증언하고 있었습니다. 저는 그 이야기의 초점이었지만, 사실 그 이야기의 일부는 아니었습니다. 저는 그저 제 일을 하고 있었을 뿐입니다. 하지만 무대 뒤에서는 많은 사람들이 제가 꽤 뛰어난 군 경력을 가지고 있다는 것을 알고 있었습니다. 제 가족은 1979년에 미국으로 왔습니다. 저는 4살이었습니다. 우리는 소련에서 도망쳐 온 유대인 난민이었습니다. 아버지는 47세의 나이에 미국에 도착했고, 아들을 먹여 살리기 위해 가구를 날랐습니다. 형, 쌍둥이 남동생, 그리고 아버지와 사이가 좋지 않았던 할머니가 있었습니다. 어머니가 돌아가셨기 때문에 아버지가 주 양육자였습니다. 저는 그 속에서 제 자리를 만들어 올라갔습니다. 이라크 전투 복무, 대사관에서 이 나라를 대표하는 임무(키이우, 우크라이나, 모스크바, 러시아), 펜타곤 복무—제가 러시아에 관한 책을 쓴 이유—그리고 백악관과 국가안보회의에서의 활동이 있었습니다. 하지만 대중은 분명히 결과에 개의치 않고 옳은 일을 위해 목소리를 낼 용기가 있었던 육군 장교의 아주 작은 조각, 작은 스냅샷만을 보았고, 그것은 제가 훈련받은 바입니다. 만약 그들이 그것만 알고 있다면, 제가 옳은 일을 위해 싸우는 사람이며, 잘못이 어디에 있든 공과 사를 정확히 가릴 것이라는 점을 안다면, 그것도 괜찮습니다. 나쁘지 않은 자리입니다.

시간을 조금 되돌려 보겠습니다. 그...

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Comment Loader Save Story Save this story Comment Loader Save Story Save this story Alex Vindman knows a thing or two about pissing off President Donald Trump . In 2019, Vindman rose to national prominence when he served as a witness during Trump’s first impeachment trial. If you’ve lost track of that particular scandal, it’s the one involving Trump, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, the Biden family … and Vindman listening in on a troubling phone call in his capacity as the director for European affairs on the National Security Council. Vindman’s congressional testimony describing that pivotal call was widely lauded, even as it ended his storied military career: After being ousted from the NSC, Vindman retired from the Army in 2020. Six years later, he’s got his eye on another governmental gig. In January, Vindman announced plans to challenge Republican incumbent Ashley Moody for the Florida seat in the US Senate previously held by Marco Rubio. Vindman, who tells me he moved to Florida in 2023 because his wife wanted to escape politics, is the latest candidate I’m chatting with ahead of the November midterms. He’s particularly interesting to me, and WIRED, for a few reasons: Vindman has lived through—and emerged from—the Trump retaliation machine, and I wanted to hear more about that journey; he’s been vocal about his opposition to both the war in Iran and ICE, two topics we cover frequently; and I wanted his view, as a longtime service member, on AI through the lens of national security. Then there’s the fact that Vindman, running in what’s ostensibly a Republican stronghold, has a decent shot at winning the damn thing: Though Senator Moody still leads in most polls, Vindman is often within spitting distance—no small feat for a first-time candidate whose campaign started around five months ago. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. KATIE DRUMMOND: Welcome to the Big Interview, Alex. ALEX VINDMAN: Thanks. Good to be here with you, Katie. So glad to have you here. You are maybe best known on a national level as a whistleblower, but you were also an Army veteran of more than 20 years. You were honored with a Purple Heart after being wounded in Iraq, and you were on the National Security Council. I&#x27;m curious if you feel like your role in the first impeachment trial of President Trump overshadows your work and your career. What would you like to be best known for? I thought you were gonna say that I was best known for my appearance on Curb Your Enthusiasm . A lot of folks seem to recognize me from there. Certainly the public knows me from [the impeachment] context. I didn&#x27;t necessarily recognize the impact. I was sitting, testifying in front of Congress. I was the focus of the story, but I wasn&#x27;t really a part of that story. I was just doing my job. But behind the scenes, a lot of folks knew me for having a pretty exceptional military career. My family came to the US in 1979. I was 4 years old. We were Jewish refugees that fled from the Soviet Union. Dad landed in the US at the age of 47, hauled furniture to be able to provide for us boys. It was my older brother, my twin brother, a grandmother he didn&#x27;t get along with. He was a primary caregiver because my mother passed away. I worked my way up through there. Combat tours in Iraq, duty, representing this nation in embassies in Kyiv, Ukraine, Moscow, Russia, Pentagon service—why I wrote the book on Russia—then the White House and the National Security Council. But the public obviously saw just a small sliver, a small snapshot of an army officer who was willing to speak up and do the right thing and damn the consequences, because that&#x27;s what I was trained to do. If that&#x27;s all they know about me, if they know that I&#x27;m a fighter for what&#x27;s right, that I will call balls and strikes regardless of where the fault lies, then that&#x27;s OK. That&#x27;s not a bad place to be. I want to go back in time a little bit, because this was several years ago; at that impeachment trial you testified before Congress about a pivotal phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. This was back in 2019, and this is the call wherein Trump appears to pressure Zelensky to investigate the Bidens. There have been dozens and dozens, if not hundreds, of scandals at the feet of President Trump. Tell me what you found so troubling about that call and why you felt compelled to come forward at that moment? I&#x27;d been serving on the National Security Council. Russia and Ukraine were already five years into a war, and what I&#x27;d witnessed was a scheme that would&#x27;ve undermined US national security, that looked like it was inspiring Russia to be even more aggressive. That&#x27;s the way I perceived it, and that&#x27;s the fact that materialized just a few years later with a full-scale war in 2022. I also witnessed what I thought was an effort to steal an election, and it was not something that I could sit idly by for. It was squarely in my area of responsibility. I had this large portfolio in a position of enormous responsibility, and I just did what I thought was right. It&#x27;s the same thing that I had trained my soldiers to do along the way: Don&#x27;t walk by a mistake. If you see something wrong, you&#x27;ve gotta say something. You could make those corrections even if it&#x27;s up the chain of command, as long as you do it respectfully and that your intent is to make sure that you&#x27;re delivering on the mission. For me, it was US national security. I don&#x27;t look backwards, and I don’t have any regrets. I think I modeled what I thought was good behavior for my fellow service members, for my daughter, who at the time was 8 years old. That chapter ended almost 22 years of military service. I&#x27;m opening up a new chapter of service. After being forced out of the military, my wife was looking for a place to move to, to get away from politics, so we moved to Florida. You moved to Florida, a stronghold for the president. That&#x27;s true, but it was also a good place for us. My best friend from my very first assignment in the military married a local in South Florida outside of Fort Lauderdale. We&#x27;d been going there for years. We had a natural network. We needed a better environment to raise our family, and it turned out to be an ideal setting for us. Just a few months after we got there, I convinced my dad, a New Yorker, to move down, and he&#x27;s 10 minutes away from me, and we&#x27;re trying to live that wonderful Florida lifestyle, but watching things slip away because it&#x27;s getting too expensive. Corruption is driving up costs. It is becoming increasingly unaffordable for folks on fixed income to survive in Florida. My daughter, who is 15 years old, a ninth grader, she&#x27;s got three years left. I want her to stay next to dad. I&#x27;m trying to make sure that we build a Florida that&#x27;s welcoming to young women, that it is a place that&#x27;s affordable for young folks, whether they go into trades or university, so that they could settle there and afford to have a good quality of life. A place where there are jobs. Unemployment in Florida is surging because of the decisions being made by this administration and Ashley Moody, my opponent, who was appointed to that role. You spent more than two decades serving in the US military. You testified in this impeachment trial. Anyone who speaks out against President Trump or takes that very public posture—I mean, you&#x27;re up against harassment, death threats. You really went through the wringer. Your wife wanted to get away from politics. You moved to Florida. Why run? It wasn&#x27;t necessarily the easiest decision. My heart&#x27;s been in public service my entire professional life. Served this country in postings around the world in combat, was wounded by a roadside bomb and earned a Purple Heart and witnessed the costs of poor decisions and what that mean