메뉴
HN
Hacker News 2일 전

칸에서 '초청 상영'한 50만 달러 AI 영화의 진실

IMP
7/10
핵심 요약

미국 AI 스타트업 힉스필드(Higgsfield)가 50만 달러를 들여 제작한 AI 장편 영화가 마치 공식 칸 영화제에서 초청 상영된 것처럼 마케팅하여 논란이 일었다. 실제 이 영화는 칸 영화제와는 별개의 상업 시장인 '영화시장(Marché du Film)'에서 유료로 상영된 것으로 확인되었으며, 이 사건은 과장된 AI 호프(Hype)가 어떻게 만들어지고 확산되는지를 보여주는 사례로 AI 업계의 윤리적 마케팅과 신뢰성에 대한 경각심을 일으키고 있다.

번역된 본문

지난주 힉스필드(Higgsfield)라는 AI 스타트업이 칸에서 AI로 제작된 장편 영화를 초청 상영했다고 발표했습니다. 월스트리트 저널(WSJ)이 이를 보도했고, 창립자는 링크드인에 "수십 년 동안 칸은 새로운 영화가 공식 인정받는 장이었다"라고 게시했습니다. 이 이야기는 빠르게 퍼졌습니다.

하지만 한 가지 문제가 있었습니다. 칸 영화제 측은 그런 일이 없다고 밝혔습니다. 공식 칸 영화제 일정에서 해당 영화를 찾지 못한 후 축제 운영진에게 직접 연락을 취한 매체 퓨처리즘(Futurism)에 따르면, 영화제 대변인은 "'헬 그라인드(Hell Grind)'는 공식 칸 영화제 프로그램의 일부로 상영되지 않았다"고 확인해주었습니다. 이 영화는 칸에서 제3자가 주최한 산업 행사에서 상영된 것입니다. 이는 명백히 다른 의미이며, 발표의 전적인 신뢰성이 '칸'이라는 이름에 기대어 있었기 때문에 그 구별은 매우 중요합니다. 이 사건은 AI 호프가 어떻게 조작되고 누군가 확인하기 전에 얼마나 빨리 확산되는지를 보여주는 완벽한 사례입니다.

'헬 그라인드'의 실체 13억 달러로 평가받는 샌프란시스코 스타트업 힉스필드는 구글의 비디오 생성 도구 등을 활용하여 2주 만에 '헬 그라인드'라는 95분 분량의 액션 영화를 만들었습니다. 총 제작비는 50만 달러였습니다. 이 중 40만 달러는 컴퓨팅 비용에 쓰였는데, 이는 현재 AI 영화 제작의 경제성이 어느 수준에 있는지를 보여줍니다. 영화는 고대 유물 중 하나를 지옥으로 끌고 가면서 강도 사건이 어그러지는 4명의 거리 도둑들의 이야기를 다룹니다. 통속적이고 액션 위주이며, 수상보다는 헐리우드 스튜디오들에게 AI 비디오 도구를 팔기 위해 고안된 개념 증명(Proof-of-Concept)에서 기대할 수 있는 바로 그런 종류의 볼거리입니다.

기술적 과정은 '그냥 AI에 프롬프트를 입력하라'는 식의 단순한 작업 이상이었습니다. 각 프롬프트는 평균 3,000단어에 달했습니다. 모든 생성은 약 15초의 영상을 만들어냈고, 사용 가능한 컷을 얻기 위해 미세한 조정과 함께 여러 번 반복해서 생성해야 했습니다. 영화의 첫 25분을 위해 16,181개의 초기 비디오가 생성되었고, 이 중 최종 253개의 컷이 선별되었습니다. 현재의 AI 도구로 장편 영화의 시각적 일관성을 유지하는 것은 매우 어려운 일이며, 팀은 인공적이고 과도하게 밝아 보이는 질 낮은 결과물을 피하기 위해 조명, 카메라 유형, 물리적 거동 등을 정의하는 세부 스타일 접두사를 모든 프롬프트에 포함해야만 했습니다. 힉스필드의 콘텐츠 총괄 책임자인 아딜 알림자노프는 "AI에게 95분짜리 멋진 비디오를 만들어 달라고 명령할 수는 없다"고 말했습니다. 이는 솔직하고 인정할 만한 부분입니다. 마케팅을 제외한다면 이면에는 진짜 작업이 존재했습니다.

칸 초청 상영 주장이 무너진 이유 '헬 그라인드'가 상영된 장소는 영화시장(Marché du Film)이었습니다. 이곳은 칸 영화제와 비즈니스 관계를 맺고 있지만, 의미 있는 선정 과정 없이 운영되는 별도의 상업적 시장입니다. 비용을 지불하는 모든 영화를 상영합니다. '샤크네이도' 같은 영화도 상영되었습니다. 이를 두고 '칸 초청 상영'이라고 부르는 것은 뉴욕 타임스에 광고를 게재하고 자신을 타임스 기자라고 소개하는 것과 거의 같습니다.

힉스필드의 창립자가 링크드인에 영화가 칸 본 영화제에서 상영된 것처럼 암시하는 게시물을 올렸을 때, 존 워시번이라는 영화 감독이 직접 답글을 달았습니다. "이것은 공식 칸 영화제에서 상영된 것이 아닙니다. 질문자가 암시하는 것과 다릅니다. 유명 축제 기간에 같은 마을의 어느 극장에서 상영료를 내고 상영한 것이 축제의 공식 선택을 받은 것과 같다는 주장은 좋게 말해 오해의 소지가 있습니다. 솔직히 말도 안 되는 헛소리입니다."

힉스필드는 나중에 영화시장이 칸 생태계의 공인된 구성 요소라고 주장하며 자신을 방어했습니다. 이는 기술적으로 호텔 기념품 가게가 호텔 생태계의 일부인 것과 같은 의미에서 사실입니다. 월스트리트 저널의 원본 기사는 영화시장에 대한 언급 없이 독자들에게 이 영화가 마치 칸 영화제에 공식 초대된 것과 같은 명확한 인상을 남겼습니다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Home Tech The $500K AI Film That 'Premiered at Cannes' Didn't Actually Premiere at... The $500K AI Film That ‘Premiered at Cannes' Didn't Actually Premiere at Cannes By Mohit Geryani May 29, 2026 0 Last updated: May 29, 2026 Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp - Advertisement - Last week an AI startup called Higgsfield announced it had premiered a fully AI-generated feature film at Cannes. The Wall Street Journal covered it. The founder posted on LinkedIn that "for decades, Cannes has been the room where new cinema gets legitimized." The story spread fast. There was one problem. Cannes said it never happened. According to Futurism , which reached out to festival organizers directly after failing to find the film on the official Cannes schedule, a festival spokesperson confirmed that "Hell Grind was not screened as part of the official Festival de Cannes program." The film was presented during an industry event organized by third parties in Cannes. That's a meaningfully different thing and the distinction matters because the entire credibility of the announcement rested on the Cannes name. It's a clean example of how AI hype gets manufactured and how quickly it travels before anyone checks. What Hell Grind actually is Higgsfield, a San Francisco startup valued at $1.3 billion, made a 95-minute action film called Hell Grind in two weeks using AI video generation tools including Google's Veo 3. Total cost was $500,000. Of that, $400,000 went to compute costs, which tells you something about where AI filmmaking economics currently sit. The film follows four street thieves whose heist goes wrong when an ancient artifact pulls one of them into the underworld. It's campy, action-heavy, and exactly the kind of spectacle you'd expect from a proof-of-concept designed to sell Hollywood studios on AI video tools rather than win awards. The technical process was more involved than the "just prompt an AI" framing suggests. Each prompt averaged 3,000 words. Every generation produced about 15 seconds of footage which then had to be generated multiple times with tweaks to get a usable shot. The first 25 minutes of the film required 16,181 initial video generations that became 253 final shots. Maintaining visual consistency across a feature-length film is genuinely hard with current AI tools and the team had to build detailed style prefixes into every prompt defining lighting, camera type, physics behavior, and more to avoid the over-lit artificial look that gets dismissed as slop. "You can't go into AI and say make me a 95-minute cool video," said Adil Alimzhanov, a content lead at Higgsfield. That's honest and worth crediting. The work was there even if the marketing around it wasn't. How the Cannes claim fell apart The venue where Hell Grind screened was the Marché du Film, which has a business relationship with the Cannes Film Festival but operates as a separate commercial marketplace with no meaningful selection process. It will screen any film that pays the fee. It has screened Sharknado. Calling it a Cannes premiere is roughly equivalent to buying an ad in the New York Times and describing yourself as a Times journalist. When Higgsfield's founder posted on LinkedIn implying the film had premiered at Cannes proper, a director named John Washburn replied directly. "This isn't screening at the Festival de Cannes, which is what you're implying. The suggestion that paying for a screening at some random theatre in the same town and at the same time as a major festival is somehow the same thing as being selected by that festival is misleading at best. Spurious bullshittery, really." Higgsfield later defended itself by saying the Marché du Film was an accredited component of the Cannes ecosystem. That's technically true in the same way that a hotel gift shop is part of the hotel ecosystem. The Wall Street Journal's original article made no mention of the Marché du Film and left readers with the clear impression the film was part of the festival proper. The paper later added a correction at the bottom of its original story clarifying the film screened at the Marché du Film, not the official festival program. The pattern this fits into Hell Grind isn't an isolated case. It's a chapter in a longer story about how AI companies build credibility through association. Earlier this year a video of Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt fighting on a rooftop went viral for its apparent AI-generated quality, with people declaring it proof that Hollywood was finished. It turned out to be an AI reskin of existing footage of two human performers in front of a green screen. The underlying capability was real but the demonstration was theater. The Cannes situation follows the same structure. The underlying capability is real. Higgsfield did make a feature-length AI film and the technical challenges they solved are genuine. But the claim that it premiered at Cannes was designed to attach prestige that the work hadn't earned through the process that prestige is supposed to represent. Demi Moore said at the festival that AI is here and fighting it is a battle that will be lost. Tilda Swinton said AI doesn't have a chance. Guillermo Del Toro said something considerably more direct to thunderous applause. The debate at Cannes was real and substantive. Hell Grind was adjacent to it geographically and nowhere near it in terms of what the festival actually validated. The $500K budget and two-week production timeline are striking numbers if they're accurate. Given the marketing around the screening it's reasonable to hold them loosely until independently verified. Tags AI LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply Comment: Please enter your comment! Name:* Please enter your name here Email:* You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Website: YOU MAY ALSO LIKE Your Car Knows More About You Than You Think. Insurance Companies Are Using That... Mohit Geryani - May 29, 2026 0 According to BBC reporting, there's a man who got a copy of his driving data from a company called LexisNexis. It was 130 pages long. Six months of every trip he and his wife took, logged, packaged, and sold without them knowing. Shortly after, his insurance costs jumped 21%. An insurance agent confirmed the data was a factor. He hadn't signed anything that felt like permission. He'd just set up his car's infotainment system. That's where we are with car privacy in 2026. Modern vehicles are collecting your location, your speed, how hard you brake, who's sitting next to you, and in some cases your weight, age, facial expressions, and driving patterns. Mozilla examined 25 car brands and found every single one failed its privacy and security standards. Cars, Mozilla concluded, were the worst product category it had ever reviewed for privacy. And most people have no idea any of this is happening. Nvidia Promised $500B for US AI. Its Next $150B Bet Is Still Taiwan. Mohit Geryani - May 28, 2026 0 Earlier this year Jensen Huang wrote a big check. Five hundred billion dollars committed to US data centers, announced with the kind of fanfare that makes a president happy and keeps tariff threats at bay. Trump called Huang brilliant. Export controls on some Nvidia chips got walked back. Everyone went home satisfied. Then Huang flew to Taiwan, broke ground on a new Nvidia headquarters, and according to Reuters, announced the company would be spending $150 billion a year there. He called Taiwan the epicenter of the AI revolution. He said it's where the chips come from, where the packaging happens, where AI supercomputers get built. He said Nvidia would be worth even more in three to five years because of it. Nobody in the Trump administration has commented on that yet. Nvidia didn't respond to questions about the tension between the two announcements. But the tension is there whether anyone acknowledges it or not, and it tells you something about where AI infrastructure actually lives versus where po