연봉 220억 원 CEO 대체할 AI의 등장

Introducing the world's first Chief Executive Replacement Engine Your CEO costs $22,000,000 a year. We cost $4,699. Once. OverpAId is an Artificial Intelligence built from the ground up to do your CEO's entire job — strategy, "vision," motivational all-hands emails — better, faster, and without ever once asking the board for a bigger jet. Runs on a single desk-sized AI computer. Real hardware, real price, zero mystique. Terminate Leadership → See The Math ↓ No golden parachute required. No severance package. No emotional support LinkedIn post. 🎉 OverpAId has raised $0 in Series A funding, at a valuation of infinity divided by zero . Investors describe the pitch meeting as "deeply uncomfortable." $18.9M Average S&P 500 CEO total compensation, in a good year for everyone except the workforce 290 : 1 Typical CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio at large public companies 24/7/365 OverpAId's uptime. Your CEO's uptime: somewhere between "at Davos" and "processing." 0 Corporate retreats OverpAId needs in Aspen to "reconnect with the mission" As Featured In (Not Really) FORBES (Nobody Reads It) THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Wouldn't Say Jack) TECHCRUNCH (Crunched By Layoffs) BLOOMBERG (Allegedly) FAST COMPANY (Slow, Actually) Live Activity What's Happening Right Now A completely real-time, definitely-not-randomized feed of executive activity vs. OverpAId activity. The Problem Let's talk about the elephant in the boardroom. Over the last four decades, CEO pay at the largest companies has grown roughly 1,000%+ , while typical worker pay has crawled forward at a fraction of that rate — despite worker productivity climbing the entire time. Somewhere along the way, the story became: pay the person at the top enough, and the value will trickle down to everyone else. It hasn't. It doesn't. It never really did. Meanwhile, the actual day-to-day decisions driving most companies — resource allocation, pattern recognition across mountains of data, "should we do the thing the data clearly says to do" — are exactly the kind of decisions software has gotten extremely good at. So we built the obvious, extremely petty, deeply satisfying next step. Meanwhile, Back At The Earnings Call The Layoff Two-Step. Across tech, retail, media, logistics, and finance, a very specific script has taken over: cut a wave of frontline and mid-level jobs, say "AI" as many times as possible in the press release, and quietly reroute the freed-up payroll into GPU leases, data center buildouts, and "agentic AI" licensing fees. The workforce gets "optimized" to pay for the AI. The AI then gets credit for replacing the workforce. And the executive team that approved both line items — the layoffs and the AI budget — stays exactly where it was, at exactly its previous salary. In tech alone, well over half a million jobs have been cut across successive waves of these announcements, a growing share of them explicitly attributed to "AI-driven efficiency," while aggregate CEO pay at the same companies kept climbing right alongside the AI capital expenditure. 👔 Fictional New CEO • 1st Incoming Chief Executive Officer | Servant Leader | Grateful Humbled and honored to step into this role at such a pivotal moment for our company. I've spent the last two weeks listening — to customers, to our board, to myself — and I can say with total conviction: our people are our greatest asset. (This post was scheduled before this morning's announcement. We are aware. We are moving forward.) 💜 2,847 💬 412 (mostly Glassdoor reviews) 🔁 89 What The Press Release Said What It Meant "Right-sizing the organization" We fired thousands of people and kept the org chart's tip fully intact. "Reallocating resources toward AI investment" Your old salary is now a line item in a GPU lease. "Building an AI-first organization" An AI agent has your job now. The executive who signed off on the agent still has theirs — plus a raise. "Agentic workforce optimization" We didn't optimize the workforce. We replaced it, then spent the savings on more of what replaced it. "Focus on core priorities" We kept the executive team. Apparently that was the core priority. "A difficult but necessary decision" Necessary for the AI budget. Difficult for everyone except whoever approved both the cuts and the budget. "Investing in our future" The "future" is fewer people, more compute, and an unchanged corner office. Executive Leadership 0% reduction Senior Directors -8% Middle Management -22% Frontline & Support Staff -34% The only layer immune to "efficiency" is the one that approves it. Here's the part that should bother you more than the layoffs themselves: these companies already believe an AI agent can do a person's job well enough to eliminate the position entirely. They just keep drawing that line one layer too low. If an agent can run a support queue, manage a supply chain, or ship half a codebase, it can obviously handle "approve the reorg" and "read the analyst note out loud on the earnings call." Somehow that layer never makes the slide. That's not a coincidence. That's the design. OverpAId flips the script on the one line item that's always exempt from the AI transformation everyone else just got handed. Finally: a workforce reduction, funded by an AI initiative, that actually starts at the top. Meanwhile, Back At The Real Estate Portfolio The Return-To-Office Two-Step A remarkably consistent pattern: companies spend years proving remote teams ship fine, then mandate a return to office citing "culture" and "collaboration" — on a timeline that tracks suspiciously well with lease renewals, downtown vacancy headlines, and commercial property valuations, and not at all with any actual drop in output. Office vacancy in major U.S. downtowns has hovered near 19–20% for years, mandates included. The desks aren't empty because people won't come back. They were never going to be full enough to matter. What The Memo Said What It Meant "We believe in-person collaboration drives innovation" We signed a 15-year lease in 2019. It's currently a third full. "Culture is built in the office" Our downtown parking garage revenue is down, and someone made calls about it. "Starting Q2, we're asking everyone back three days a week" Property held at cost on the balance sheet does not enjoy being reassessed. "This isn't about monitoring, it's about connection" Badge-swipe data is now somebody's KPI. "We've heard your feedback and remain committed to flexibility" You may sit at a different empty desk each day. "Our data shows collaboration improves in person" Our data shows nothing of the kind. Nobody asked to see it. The Offsite That Prompted All This (Itemized) Private jet charter, round trip: $340,000 3-night resort block, executive suites: $128,000 "Team alignment" mixology class: $6,200 Keynote speaker (was on a podcast once): $75,000 Branded fleece vests, size: only Medium: $14,000 Total: $563,200 — or full-year health coverage for roughly 47 employees. The tell is always the same: no company has ever mandated a return to office because remote productivity got worse. They mandated it because an asset on the books needed a pulse in the lobby to justify its valuation — and moving four thousand employees turned out to be easier than admitting a fifteen-year lease was a mistake. OverpAId has no commute, no badge, and no assigned desk — and, not coincidentally, no opinion whatsoever about anyone's downtown parking garage revenue. Auto-Draft An RTO Memo For Your Next All-Hands Corporate Jargon Bingo Print this out. Bring it to your next town hall, standup, or "quick sync." OverpAId has never once generated any of the following phrases unprompted. Humans — usually the ones with the biggest packages — still do, constantly, apparently for free. Circle Back Move The Needle Low-Hanging Fruit Boil The Ocean Bandwidth Take This Offline Double-Click On That North Star Paradigm Shift Growth Hacking Best-In-Class Value-Add Synergy (Free Space) Deep Dive Culture Fit Think Outside The Box A