메뉴
BL
Wired AI • 50일 전

미국 이민국 DNA 수집, 스페이스X 달 충돌, 그리고 커지는 AI 반발

IMP
7/10
핵심 요약

이번 주 IT 매체 와이어드(WIRED)의 '언캐니 밸리' 팟캐스트에서는 미국 이민세관단속국(ICE)이 무려 100만 명에 달하는 이민자와 아동의 DNA를 수집해 FBI 데이터베이스를 구축하고 있는 실태를 조명했습니다. 또한 구글 어스(Google Earth)의 저품질 AI 생성물에 대한 반발, 백악관의 비밀스러운 AI 사이버 보안 계획, 스페이스X 로켓의 달 표면 충돌, 그리고 전미적으로 확산하는 데이터센터 반대 운동과 그 정치적 파장까지 핵심 기술·정책 이슈를 총망라했습니다.

번역된 본문

이번 주 '언캐니 밸리(Uncanny Valley)'에서 브라이언 배럿, 조 쉬퍼, 레아 파이거는 미국 이민세관단속국(ICE)이 어린아이들을 포함해 올해 약 100만 명의 DNA를 수집하여 영구적인 FBI 데이터베이스를 구축하고 있는 현황을 분석했습니다. 또한 구글 어스(Google Earth)의 저품질 AI 콘텐츠(AI slop)에 대한 반발, 백악관의 비밀스러운 AI 사이버 보안 계획, 스페이스X(SpaceX) 로켓의 달 표면 충돌 사건에 대해 논의했습니다. 더불어 와이어드의 몰리 태프트와 함께 미국 전역에서 데이터센터 건설을 반대하는 기묘한 좌우 연합에 관한 최근 기사를 다룹니다.

이번 에피소드에서 언급된 기사 목록:

  • 작년 ICE가 어린 아동을 포함해 약 100만 명의 DNA를 수집했다
  • AI 인플루언서들이 미지의 영역으로 향하고 있다
  • 백악관이 AI 사이버 보안 프레임워크를 비밀에 부치고 있다
  • AI 해킹도 위험하지만, AI 웜과 바이러스는 더 끔찍할 것이다
  • 아무도 예상 못한 스페이스X의 팰컨 9(Falcon 9) 로켓 달 충돌
  • 데이터센터가 어떻게 미국 정치를 파멸시켰는가

블루스카이(Bluesky)에서 브라이언 배럿(@brbarrett), 조 쉬퍼(@zoeschiffer), 레아 파이거(@leahfeiger), 몰리 태프트(@mollytaft.com)를 팔로우할 수 있습니다. 의견은 [이메일 보호됨]으로 보내주세요.

청취 방법: 이 페이지의 오디오 플레이어를 통해 이번 주 팟캐스트를 들을 수 있습니다. 모든 에피소드를 무료로 받고 싶다면 아이폰이나 아이패드에서 '팟캐스트(Podcasts)' 앱을 열고 링크를 누르거나, Overcast나 Pocket Casts 같은 앱을 다운로드하여 'uncanny valley'를 검색하세요. 스포티파이(Spotify)에서도 청취할 수 있습니다.

참고 사항: 본 자막은 자동 생성되어 오류가 포함될 수 있습니다.

조 쉬퍼: 와이어드의 '언캐니 밸리'에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 기고 에디터 조 쉬퍼입니다. 브라이언 배럿: 에디터 브라이언 배럿입니다. 레아 파이거: 정치·과학 국장 레아 파이거입니다.

브라이언 배럿: 오늘 쇼에서는 이민세관단속국(ICE)이 놀라운 속도로 DNA 샘플을 수집하고 있는 문제에 대해 이야기해 보겠습니다. 이 수집된 샘플들로 인해 어린아이들을 포함한 수십만 명의 사람들이 사실상 영원히 FBI 범죄 데이터베이스에 등록되었습니다.

조 쉬퍼: 또한 우리가 즐겨 다루는 주제 중 하나인 '저품질 AI 콘텐츠(AI slop)'에 대해서도 이야기할 것입니다. 사람들이 AI로 가짜 지도를 만들면서 구글 어스가 새로운 AI 도구를 비활성화한 것부터, 서브스택(Substack)이 AI 작성 탐지 도구인 팬그램(Pangram)과 제휴한 것까지, 기업들은 이제 사람들이 저품질 AI 콘텐츠가 피드에 넘쳐나는 것을 정말 싫어한다는 사실을 깨닫기 시작했습니다.

레아 파이거: AI 분야와 관련하여 백악관은 AI 기업들이 야기하는 증가하는 보안 위험을 해결하기 위한 계획을 발표했습니다. 세부 사항은 대부분 비밀로 유지하고 있지만, 이러한 비밀주의 이면에는 무엇이 있으며 향후 규제에 어떤 의미를 갖는지 논의해 볼 것입니다.

브라이언 배럿: 스페이스X 로켓의 일부가 달에 충돌해 새로운 크레이터를 남기고 온갖 의문점을 야기한 사건에 대해서도 이야기할 예정입니다.

레아 파이거: 그리고 쇼 후반부에서는 와이어드 수석 기자 몰리 태프트가 합류하여 데이터센터가 어떻게 미국 정치를 파탄 내렸는지 자세히 들려줄 것입니다.

브라이언 배럿: 자, 먼저 ICE 이야기부터 시작해 보죠. 최근 좀 다루지 않았지만 그들은 여전히 존재하며 여전히 나쁜 일들을 저지르고 있습니다. 여기에는 DNA 샘플 수집도 포함됩니다. 와이어드의 드루브 메로트라(Dhruv Mehrotra)는 이번 주에 ICE가 지난 한 해 동안, 오직 작년 한 해 동안에만 어린 아동의 것을 포함하여 거의 100만 명의 DNA를 수집했다고 보도했습니다. 앞서 언급했듯, 이러한 DNA 수집으로 인해 전과가 없는 수십만 명의 사람들이 영구적으로 FBI 데이터베이스에 등록되었습니다. 실제로 국토안보부는 이 데이터베이스에 새로운 프로필을 추가하는 가장 큰 출처가 되었습니다.

레아 파이거: 끊임없이 쏟아지는 이런 뉴스들은 '당신의 프라이버시 중 한 부분이 또 사라졌다, 당신의 보안 중 한 부분이 또 사라졌다'며 우리를 압도하는 것 같습니다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Comment Loader Save Story Save this story Comment Loader Save Story Save this story This week on Uncanny Valley , Brian Barrett, Zoë Schiffer, and Leah Feiger break down how ICE has collected DNA from nearly a million people this year, including young children, feeding an FBI database indefinitely. The team also discusses the backlash against Google Earth’s AI slop, the White House’s secretive AI cybersecurity plan, and SpaceX rocket crashing into the moon. Plus, WIRED’s Molly Taft discusses their recent story on the strange left-right coalition fighting data centers across the US. Articles mentioned in this episode: ICE Collected Nearly 1 Million People’s DNA Last Year—Including Young Children AI Influencers Are Heading Into Uncharted Territory The White House Is Keeping Its AI Cybersecurity Framework Secret AI Hacks Are Bad. AI Worms and Viruses Will Be Worse Welp, Nobody Saw SpaceX’s Falcon 9 Rocket Crash Into the Moon How Data Centers Broke American Politics You can follow Brian Barrett on Bluesky at @brbarrett , Zoë Schiffer on Bluesky at @zoeschiffer , Leah Feiger on Bluesky at @leahfeiger , and Molly Taft on Bluesky @mollytaft.com . Write to us at [email protected] . How to Listen You can always listen to this week's podcast through the audio player on this page, but if you want to subscribe for free to get every episode, here's how: If you're on an iPhone or iPad, open the app called Podcasts, or just tap this link . You can also download an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts and search for “uncanny valley.” We’re on Spotify too. Transcript Note: This is an automated transcript, which may contain errors. Zoe Schiffer : Welcome to WIRED's Uncanny Valley . I'm Zoe Schiffer, contributing editor. Brian Barrett : I'm Brian Barrett, executive editor. Leah Feiger : And I'm Leah Feiger, director of politics and science. Brian Barrett : Today on the show, we're talking about how the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, better known as ICE, has been collecting DNA samples at an alarming rate. These samples have led to hundreds of thousands of people, including young children, to end up in an FBI criminal database basically forever. Zoe Schiffer : We'll also get into one of our favorite topics, AI slop. From Google Earth disabling its new AI tool after people used it to create fake maps, to Substack partnering with the AI writing detection tool Pangram, companies are starting to realize that people really don't like low-quality AI content flooding their feeds. Leah Feiger : Also in the realm of AI, the White House announced a plan to tackle the increasing security risks brought on by AI companies. It's keeping the details mostly under wraps, but we're going to discuss what's behind all the secrecy and what this could mean for future regulation. Brian Barrett : We'll also talk about how part of a SpaceX rocket crashed into the moon, leaving a new crater behind and all kinds of questions. Leah Feiger : And later in the show, WIRED senior writer Molly Taft joins to tell us all about how data centers have officially broken US politics. Brian Barrett : Well, to start off, let's talk about ICE, which we haven't in a little bit, but they're still there. They're still doing bad things, including collecting DNA samples. WIRED’s Dhruv Mehrotra reported this week about how ICE has collected nearly 1 million people's DNA this past year, just this past year alone, including that of young children. As we mentioned up top, this DNA collection has led to hundreds of thousands of people with no criminal convictions ending up in an FBI database indefinitely. And in fact, the Department of Homeland Security has become the single largest source of new profiles in this database. Leah Feiger : I feel like we're getting inundated with here's one more part of your privacy, here's one more part of security, here's one more bit of immigrants being treated as subhuman. But this one, at least enough for me, broke through the noise. Don't you guys think? This was wild. Zoe Schiffer : I feel like I have a question before we move forward, which is maybe one that's shared by listeners. Why is DNA being collected from immigrants in the first place? This surprised me, and maybe I'm a little naïve about what they're subjected to when they're in this country. Brian Barrett : Yeah, I mean, I think the answer is because they can. And I wish that we're more nuanced or subtle than that, but I think they are just trying to gather as much information as they can at all times. I want to be clear too, these are not people with criminal convictions, people who are even necessarily suspected of a crime. It is just such a wide net that they are casting. In fact, internal training materials that drove, in partnership with researchers at Georgetown, we should say, dug up, said that asylum seekers and refugees who have not adjusted their immigration status must have their DNA sampled and that the DNA needs to be collected after any arrest. It is just table stakes for these officers to grab DNA whenever and wherever they can. Leah Feiger : And already a lot of lawmakers have been speaking out against this. For example, when learning that children were being swabbed at a family detention center in Dilley, Texas, a number of representatives said in a joint statement to WIRED, none of the families at Dilley have been convicted of a crime. They do not belong in a database meant for violent criminals, especially children. This is starting to pick up steam across the board. I think that we've just gotten so used to the idea that the government is allowed to collect any information it wants, store it in whichever way it wants. And all of these norms have been destroyed in the last year and a half. It's really shocking, honestly. Zoe Schiffer : So you're saying basically that refusing to allow your DNA to be collected can become its own chart, can become a mark on your record regardless of what you had previously. Brian Barrett : Not only a mark on your record. WIRED and Dhruv identified two prosecutions filed in 2025 against people in immigration custody who refused DNA collection. It is becoming a crime to say, "I don't want you to do that." That's one thing. Then the other thing too that I think we've mentioned, but I want to dig into a little bit, is that they have started recently... I think the shift to collecting DNA from families is also relatively new. And we're talking about, I think the official line is that kids as young as 14 can have their DNA collected, but Georgetown and WIRED identified 492 children under 14 whose DNA the agency sent to the FBI, not just collected, but sent onto the FBI between January 2025 and January 2026. That included 21 5-year-olds, 32 6-year-olds, 33 7-year-olds who are now in an FBI DNA database for the rest of their lives. Leah Feiger : I mean, the kicker to me here too, part of this has to do with "preventing future crime." It's all supposed to be about how the primary purpose is to build a national DNA database for solving crimes, which is a theory. OK, sure. Solving crimes, cool about that. But these are 5-year-olds. These are 5-year-olds whose—so many of their rights have already been taken away by this current administration and DOJ and DHS. To have that as an additional marker to me is a really important visual next step of the war on immigrants at this moment in the country. Zoe Schiffer : All right. I'm going to take us from the depths of despair. Just drag us up. Brian Barrett : Some would say AI slop is maybe not the depths, but we're definitely still in despair territory. Leah Feiger : I mean, I love the depths of despair, my favorite place to be. Zoe Schiffer : I find it funny, but I have a bunch of thoughts on it and my views on this have been evolving