메뉴
BL
TechCrunch AI 44일 전

AI 기업 공개 행진, 누가 이 파도에 올라탈까

IMP
8/10
핵심 요약

스페이스X의 역대 최대 규모 기업공개(IPO)를 시작으로, 오픈AI와 앤스로픽 같은 주요 AI 기업들이 잇따라 상장을 준비하며 올여름 IPO 시장이 달아오르고 있습니다. 이는 공개 시장의 막대한 자금이 기존 소비자 중심에서 AI 연구소 및 심층기술(deeptech) 기업으로 빠르게 이동하고 있음을 보여줍니다.

번역된 본문

Apple Podcasts에서 듣기 Spotify에서 듣기

이번 주 스페이스X(SpaceX)가 역대 최대 규모의 기업공개(IPO)를 진행하며, CEO 일론 머스크(Elon Musk)를 세계 최초의 조각호주의자로 만들었다. '스페이스X'라는 이름과 달리, 이 회사는 고비용이 드는 자체 AI(AI) 사업의 잠재력을 강조해 왔으며, 경쟁사인 오픈AI(OpenAI)와 앤스로픽(Anthropic) 역시 조만간 자체적으로 상장 시장에 데뷔할 가능성이 있다. 따라서 최신 에피소드의 테크크런치(TechCrunch) '에퀴티(Equity)' 팟캐스트에서 키르스텐 코로섹(Kirsten Korosec), 숀 오케인(Sean O'Kane), 그리고 저는 뜨거운 IPO의 여름이 될 것 같은 전망에 대해 논의했습니다.

숀(Sean)은 "스페이스X는 공개 시장에서 이용 가능한 막대한 자금을 흡수할 뿐만 아니라, 공개 기업(public company)이 될 수 있는 한계와 한 개인이 회사를 얼마나 통제할 수 있는지에 대한 한계를 진정으로 테스트하고 있다"고 말했다. "저는 상장할 다른 기술 기업들이 이를 얼마나 모방하려고 할지에 정말 주목하고 있습니다."

키르스텐(Kirsten)은 스페이스X가 해당 개념을 대중화한 후 궤도 데이터 센터를 위한 자금을 조달하는 등, "스페이스X의 IPO 물결에 편승"하려는 다른 스타트업들도 있다고 언급했다. 그녀는 "따라서 시장 전반에 걸쳐 연쇄 반응(Ripple effect)이 일어나고 있는데, 이것이 아마도 '스페이스X가 일론을 조각호주의자로 만들었다'는 단순한 헤드라인보다 훨씬 더 흥미로울 것"이라고 덧붙였다.

기사 길이와 명확성을 위해 편집된 대화 내용 미리 보기를 계속 읽어보시기 바랍니다.

앤서니 하(Anthony Ha): 저는 스페이스X IPO 자체에서 조금 벗어나 넓은 시각을 보고 싶습니다. 왜냐하면 일론 머스크에 관한 모든 논란을 넘어, 이는 다양한 AI 기업들을 위한 일련의 IPO 시작점이기 때문입니다. 우리는 이미 앤스로픽이 비밀리에 상장을 신청했다는 것을 논의했었고, 이제 오픈AI도 같은 행동을 취했습니다. 두 분은 이 소식에 대해 얼마나 기대하고 계신가요?

키르스텐 코로섹(Kirsten Korosec): 먼저 제가 줄리 보트(Julie Bort)의 기사를 좋아한다고 말하고 싶은데, 그녀의 기사가 이 상황을 아주 멋지게 요약해 준다고 생각합니다. 제목이 아주 훌륭해서 여기서 읽어보겠습니다. "이제 FAANG이 아니라 MANGOS입니다." FAANG은 페이스북(현재 메타), 아마존, 애플, 넷플릭스, 구글(현재 알파벳)을 의미했습니다. 하지만 이제는 그 구도가 바뀌어 메타(Meta), 앤스로픽(Anthropic), 엔비디아(NVIDIA), 구글(Google), 오픈AI(OpenAI), 스페이스X(SpaceX)가 되었습니다. 물론 여전히 막대한 규모의 기술 기업들이 존재하지만, 여기에는 분명한 변화가 있죠? 첫째, 그룹에 여러 AI 연구소(labs)가 포함되어 있다는 점이 매우 다릅니다. 대형 스트리밍 서비스인 넷플릭스는 거기에서 밀려났습니다. 그래서 저에게 있어 공개 시장과, 소비자 및 소셜 네트워크 중심에서 특정 AI 연구소와 스페이스X 같은 혁신적인 심층 기술(deeptech)로 막대한 자금과 자본이 이동하고 있다는 것은 매우 흥미로운 변화입니다. 아마도 이번 여름이 저희 기자들에게 오랜만의 가장 바쁜 여름이 될 것이라는 사실을 제외하면 말이죠.

숀 오케인(Sean O'Kane): 한때 저는 변호사가 되고 싶었지만, 그러지 않은 이유 중 하나는 감당해야 할 서류 작업이 싫었기 때문입니다. 그런데 지금 저는 올여름 미국 증권거래위원회(SEC)의 수백 페이지가 넘는 공시 서류를 읽는 것을 고대하고 있습니다. 완전한 해변에서 읽을 거리(Talk about a beach read)죠. 이는 우리가 오랫동안 예상해 온 순간입니다. 우리는 지난 몇 년 동안 사모 시장에 대한 우려와 사람들이 시리즈 [어쩌구] 펀딩 라운드를 진행하는 것에 대한 조소 속에서 IPO 시장이 다시 '열릴' 것인지 궁금해했습니다. 이는 공개 시장 전반에 대한 좋은 스트레스 테스트입니다. 여기서 '좋은'이라는 단로는 여러분이 원하는 대로 해석하시든지요. 스페이스X는 공개 시장에서 이용 가능한 막대한 자금의 상당 부분을 흡수할 뿐만 아니라, 공개 기업이 가질 수 있는 한계와 한 사람이 회사를 통제할 수 있는 정도에 대해 스트레스 테스트를 하고 있습니다. 저는 상장할 다른 기술 기업들이 이를 얼마나 모방하려고 할지에 정말 주목하고 있습니다. 제가 스페이스X에 대해 계속 말하고 생각하는 것은, 그들이 2000년대 초반 구글과 메타의 초기 IPO가 가졌던 가장 극단적인 측면들을 아마존의 '영원히 적자를 본다'는 태도와 융합하려 한다는 것입니다. 그래서 저는 앤스로픽(Anthropic)이 그 방식을 얼마나 따라 할지 궁금합니다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Listen on Apple Podcasts Listen on Spotify SpaceX went public this week in the largest IPO ever , making CEO Elon Musk the world’s first trillionaire . Despite its name, SpaceX has been emphasizing the potential of its costly AI business , and competitors OpenAI and Anthropic may soon follow with their own public market debuts. So on the latest episode of TechCrunch’s Equity podcast , Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I discussed what’s looking like a hot IPO summer. “We have SpaceX not only sucking up just a huge chunk of the money that's available on public markets, but also really stress testing the limits of what a public company can be and how much it can be controlled by one single person,” Sean said. “My eye is really on these other tech companies that will go public and how much they will try to emulate.” Kirsten also noted that there are other startups trying to “ride that SpaceX IPO wave,” for example by raising money for orbital data centers after SpaceX helped to popularize the concept. “So there's a ripple effect that's happening throughout the market that I think is probably even more interesting than just the headline, ‘SpaceX makes Elon a trillionaire,’” she said. Keep reading for a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity. Anthony Ha: I want to zoom out a little bit from just the SpaceX IPO, because beyond the Elon Musk of it all, it’s the beginning of what could be a [series] of different IPOs for different AI companies. We've talked about Anthropic confidentially filing to go public, and now OpenAI has done the same. How excited are either of you about this? Kirsten Korosec: I want to start off by saying that I love Julie Bort’s story, which I think sums it up pretty nicely. It's a great headline, so I'm gonna read it here: “ It's not FAANG anymore, it's MANGOS .” FAANG being Facebook, which is now Meta; Amazon; Apple; Netflix; Google, now Alphabet. Now it's shifted, and we've got Meta, Anthropic, NVIDIA, Google, OpenAI, SpaceX. [We’ve still got] massive tech companies, surely, but there is a shift here, right? First of all, we've got a bunch of AI labs in there, and that's very different. Netflix gets booted out of there, a giant streaming service. And so to me, it's an interesting shift in terms of public markets and the vast amount of money and capital available in the public markets shifting away from consumer [and] social networks and towards, specifically, AI labs and other, more innovative deeptech, such as SpaceX. So I think that's the most interesting thing — aside from the fact that this summer is going to keep us all very busy as reporters, more than probably any other summer in a while. Sean O'Kane: You know, once upon a time I wanted to be a lawyer, and one of the reasons I didn't was because I hated the paperwork that was going to be involved. And here I am looking forward to reading hundreds more pages of SEC filings this summer — talk about a beach read. It's a moment we've been anticipating for a while. We've spent the last few years really wondering if the IPO market was going to quote-unquote “open back up” after a lot of consternation about private markets, and mockery about people reaching their like Series [whatever] fundraising round. This is a good stress test — I mean, “good,” take that word however you want — a good stress test of public markets in general. We have SpaceX not only sucking up just a huge chunk of the money that's available on public markets, but also really stress testing the limits of what a public company can be and how much it can be controlled by one single person. My eye is really on these other tech companies that will go public and how much they will try to emulate. A thing that I keep saying and thinking about with SpaceX is, they're really trying to take some of the most extreme aspects of Google and Meta's original IPOs back in the early 2000s and mashing it up with that “We'll lose money forever” with Amazon. And I'm curious how much Anthropic and OpenAI will try to do the same. Will they remake themselves in the image of SpaceX? Or will they try to put themselves in a different light? Anthony: One aspect that really got driven home as I was reading about the OpenAI IPO is also the extent to which some of this is also a bit of a race in terms of timing. I think we can confidently say at this point, SpaceX is first out the gate, which probably has some advantages and disadvantages. It's also a bit of a different company because it's billing itself as an AI company, but obviously has a bunch of other stuff going on, too. But there is a sense in which, at least according to some analysts, OpenAI and Anthropic may both want to go before the other one, because there's only a finite amount of capital, a finite amount of interest. At some point some of these valuations have to start coming back down to Earth, and so they may both be scrambling to be first. Kirsten: I mean, there's very much a race between Anthropic and OpenAI. You're even seeing OpenAI talk about slashing prices, and they’re certainly going to be competing on the IPO calendar. But that is very short-term thinking. If they're smart, they should be much more concerned about the long-term play here. To me, what's really interesting is while Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX all prepare for these moments, there are a host of other companies out there that are raising money on the backs of the success of companies like SpaceX, or going into SPACs. Just today, for instance, or as we're recording this, a company called Quantum Space is doing a SPAC and absolutely trying to ride that SpaceX IPO wave. We've got a host of other startups that our reporter Tim Ferholz has reported on that are clearly — they're not going to go public, right? But if SpaceX is successful with space data centers, they're raising money off of that potential and they're building businesses on that potential. So there's a ripple effect that's happening throughout the market that I think is probably even more interesting than just the headline, “ SpaceX makes Elon a trillionaire.” Sean: The commonly accepted theory in Silicon Valley is that AI is remaking the economy, but because of its use . AI is actually already remaking the economy — just because of how people are trying to build it. We have everything that you just described, we have these other companies rushing to public markets. And I think that's a really good point to think about: Will they ever regret rushing to public markets? But we even have companies like Ford and General Motors who are pivoting their unused battery creation capacity to be energy providers for data centers. And Ford's stock shot up when it announced what is honestly a pretty modest-looking energy storage business , in comparison to something like Tesla. And Tim De Chant had a really great series of stories this week about GM's pivot , as well. The economy's already being remade. Whether that's durable, again, that's the question, but it's happening right now. Kirsten: That is actually a really good point, because to me, I want to say five, six, seven, eight years ago, there were all these headlines of “the next Tesla killer” and these automakers and other companies are still chasing trying to recreate all these various businesses, and specifically the strategies of Elon Musk-based businesses. They haven't learned their lesson. I wish I could communicate this to all the automaker CEOs out there: I get it that you have a lot of unused batteries and you want to pivot to something else, but trying to model your business after Tesla or SpaceX and others, it doesn't always work. Perhaps look elsewhere. Sean: So Ford shouldn't get into space data centers. Is what you're saying? Kirsten: No, they shouldn't. But just watch. This is going to happen. Topics AI , Anthropic , Elon Musk , Equity podcast , Fundraising , Space , SpaceX , Startups When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission