대시레인, 20개 암호화 금고 탈취 경고

Text settings Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only Learn more Minimize to nav There’s a lot that doesn’t add up in a security advisory password manager Dashlane published Monday, warning that attackers managed to obtain 20 encrypted user vaults. “Starting on Sunday, May 31, 2026, an external party launched a brute force attack against certain Dashlane user accounts,” the company said . “The goal of the attack was to brute-force two-factor authentication (2FA) protections to allow the attacker to register new devices on existing user accounts.” Hello, Dashlane, anybody home? A Dashlane user who received such a 2FA request provided this screenshot of the notification, which arrived on Sunday. The UK-based user was concerned and contacted Dashlane through a support bot. Ultimately the user got no information about why the notification was sent. “Then [I] discovered this news from Mastodon infosec and not Dashlane themselves,” the user told me. “Currently trying to find out what has happened! Because how can you trigger a 2fa request if you haven’t got the password 1st? As a paying customer I think I should have known about this from Dashlane and not Mastodon infosec folks.” Scores of social media discussions are filled with similar comments from users who also don’t understand the basic mechanics of this attack. Typically, 2FA protections take the form of a one-time password generated by an authentication app or sent by text or email. They’re typically six digits long and change every 45 or so seconds, although as the notification above indicates, the code remained valid for three hours. Brute-forcing is a trial-and-error method that rapidly submits every possible combination until landing on the right one. Under these assumptions, there would be 1 million possible passcodes. A successful breach would require a statistically significant percentage of them to be entered within the three-hour window. While the resources needed to bombard Dashlane servers with that volume of guesses in such a short period of time are possible, they’re not commonly found in usual brute-force attacks. Dashlane doesn’t explicitly say it placed a rate limit on the number of submissions a user can make, although it appears likely based on language in the advisory saying “Because of the high volume of attempts on user accounts, Dashlane’s security controls automatically locked accounts that were targeted by the attack.” Even assuming there was no rate limiting, it’s hard to imagine Dashlane servers not at least temporarily choking when receiving 150,000 or more submissions in an hour or so. It’s possible that Dashlane’s reference to 2FA meant something else. Sometimes, 2FA can come in the form of push notifications. Once someone enters the correct account password, the notification is sent to the registered device. For the login to succeed, the user must press a button on their device that provides the second factor. A tactic known as 2FA fatigue attacking exploits the friction of this process. An attacker who has already broken the first authentication factor attempts to log in repeatedly, resulting in a push notification being sent to the target each time. After dozens or even hundreds of attempts, the target finally gives in and presses the approve button. And of course, brute-force attacks on 2FA require the first authentication factor to already have been broken. Dashlane makes no mention of what this factor is or how it was broken. It’s still further plausible that the attack exploited features that allow Dashlane users to enroll new devices in their accounts. Such techniques typically work by tricking the user into approving a request to approve a device owned by the attacker instead. Dashlane said it has contacted fewer than 20 account holders whose encrypted vaults were obtained. “If you’re a Dashlane user and have not received a message from Dashlane specific to vault risk, there is no impact to your Dashlane account,” the company said. It also notes that without the master decryption password—which Dashlane never sees or stores—vault contents remain safe. But without more information, we’re left with more questions than we should be. Dashlane has maintained silence for more than 48 hours since publishing the opaque advisory. Company representatives didn’t respond to an email seeking details. Post updated to add details from a Dashlane user who recived the notifcation. Dan Goodin Senior Security Editor Dan Goodin Senior Security Editor Dan Goodin is Senior Security Editor at Ars Technica, where he oversees coverage of malware, computer espionage, botnets, hardware hacking, encryption, and passwords. In his spare time, he enjoys gardening, cooking, and following the independent music scene. Dan is based in San Francisco. Follow him at here on Mastodon and here on Bluesky. Contact him on Signal at DanArs.82. 15 Comments