메뉴
BL
Wired AI 31일 전

미국 구급대원들 "웨이모 자율주행차, 갈수록 심각해진다"

IMP
8/10
핵심 요약

미국 샌프란시스코와 오스틴의 소방관 및 경찰 등 구급 실무자들이 연방 당국과의 비공개 회의에서 웨이모 자율주행차의 잦은 오작동에 대한 깊은 우려를 표명했습니다. 도로 위에서 멈춰버리는 차량들로 인해 실제 비상 구조 활동에 심각한 지연이 발생하고 있으며, 배포 초기보다 교통법규 위반과 고질적인 문제가 오히려 악화되고 있다고 지적했습니다. 이는 웨이모가 전 세계로 사업을 확장하려는 시점에 자율주행 기술의 안전성과 사회적 수용성에 대한 중대한 걸림돌로 작용할 수 있습니다.

번역된 본문

긴급 구조대 책임자들이 지난달 연방 규제 당국과의 비공개 회의에서 도로에서 운행되는 자율주행차의 성능에 깊은 좌절감을 표명했습니다. 도시 소방관, 경찰관, 응급구조사(EMT), 구급대원들이 비상 상황에서 멈춰 있거나 꼼짝하지 않는 차량 문제를 해결하는 데 귀중한 시간을 강제로 낭비해야 한다는 것입니다. 한 소방 관계자는 이를 "우리 구조대원과 피해자 모두를 위한 안전 위험"이라고 불렀습니다. 매거진 WIRED는 해당 회의의 녹음 파일을 입수했습니다.

웨이모(Waymo)가 운전자 없이 승객을 운송한 지 1년이 넘은 샌프란시스코와 오스틴의 관계자들은 자율주행차의 성능이 점점 악화되고 있다고 말했습니다. 샌프란시스코 비상관리국의 메리 엘런 캐롤(Mary Ellen Carroll) 국장은 미국 내 자율주행차 안전을 감독하는 국립도로교통안전국(NHTSA) 관계자들에게 "우리는 흥미로운 현상, 즉 이전에 개선되었던 것들이 후퇴하는 현상을 실제로 목격하고 있다"며 "자율주행차들이 더 많은 교통법규를 위반하고 있다"고 전했습니다.

패트릭 래빗(Patrick Rabbitt) 샌프란시스코 소방서장은 "우리는 몇 년 동안 보지 못했던 행동을 최근 보고 있다... 웨이모가 이제는 소방서 출입을 빈번하게 막고 있다"며 "이 차량들의 기본 반응은 멈추는(freeze) 것이다"라고 덧붙였습니다. 그는 이러한 상황이 소방차가 비상 상황에 '적시적절하게' 대응하는 것을 방해할 수 있다고 경고했습니다.

오스틴 경찰국 고속도로 단속 부서장인 윌리엄 화이트(William White) 경감은 오스틴의 구급대원들도 자주 '멈춰버리는' 웨이모 차량들 때문에 골머리를 앓고 있다고 밝혔습니다. 화이트 경감은 웨이모가 구급대원들에게 했던 말과는 달리, 차량들이 경찰관의 수신호를 인식하거나 반응하지 못하는 경우가 많으며, 이는 비상 상황이나 비정상적인 도로 사고 시 연쇄적인 지연으로 이어질 수 있다고 말했습니다. 그는 "기술이 실제로 준비되지 않았을 때 수백 대의 차량으로 너무 빠르고 대규모로 배포된 것 같다"고 지적했습니다.

WIRED의 논평 요청에 NHTSA는 답변하지 않았습니다. 이러한 불만 제기는 웨이모가 미국 전역과 전 세계로 야심 찬 확장을 시작하려는 시점에 나오고 있습니다. 현재 이 회사는 미국 10개 도시의 일부 지역에서 무인 주행 차량 서비스를 제공하고 있으며, 올해 말까지 런던을 포함한 10개 도시에 추가로 서비스를 출시할 계획입니다. 웨이모는 지난달 주당 50만 건의 유상 운행 서비스를 제공하고 있다고 밝혔습니다. 이 수치는 여전히 사람이 운전하는 라이드 헤일링(호출) 서비스보다 훨씬 적지만(우버는 주당 약 4억 건 제공), 작년보다는 10배나 성장한 규모입니다.

하지만 이미 서비스가 운영되고 있는 도시들의 이러한 비판은 무인 주행 기술의 도입 속도를 늦출 위협이 됩니다. 웨이모의 자체 데이터에 따르면 자율주행차는 사람이 운전하는 차량에 비해 심각한 충돌 사고를 줄여줍니다. 웨이모는 이미 보스턴, 뉴욕, 시애틀, 워싱턴 D.C. 등 인구 밀도가 높고 수익성이 잠재적인 거대 도시에서, 특히 노동조합 등 조직적인 정치적 반대에 직면해 있습니다.

웨이모의 줄리아 일리나(Julia Ilina) 대변인은 성명을 통해 "우리는 구급대원들과의 파트너십과 안전에 대한 공동의 노력을 깊이 가치 있게 여깁니다. 그들의 지속적인 피드백은 웨이모 서비스의 의미 있는 개선을 이끄는 데 중요한 역할을 했다"고 밝혔습니다. 또한 웨이모 측은 전국적으로 3만 5,000명 이상의 응급 구조대원을 대상으로 대면 교육을 실시했다고 덧붙였습니다.

공개 의견 수렴 기간 비공개 회의에서 나온 이번 발언들은 정부 관리들이 공식적으로 공개적으로 말한 것보다 훨씬 직설적입니다. 하지만 이는 적어도 작년 말부터 시장 지도자들이 표출해 온, 오랫동안 잠재되어 있거나 때로는 거칠게 터져 나왔던 불만을 반영합니다. 캘리포니아와 텍사스에서 자율주행차 운행은 시 당국이 아닌 주(州) 정부에 의해 규제되기 때문에, 지역 구급대원 부서와 이들을 대표하는 사람들은 원래 웨이모 같은 개발사에게 운영에 대한 구체적인 변경을 요청하는 것만 가능합니다.

수요일, 오스틴의 구급대원들은 시의회에 출석해 지난달 무인 주행 차량이 구급차를 막았던 사건에 대해 웨이모가 어떻게 대응했는지 논의하기 위해 나섰습니다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Comment Loader Save Story Save this story Comment Loader Save Story Save this story Emergency first-responder leaders told federal regulators in a private meeting last month that they were frustrated with the performance of autonomous vehicles on their streets—that city firefighters, police officers, EMTs, and paramedics are forced to spend time during emergencies resolving issues with frozen or stuck cars. One fire official called them “a safety issue for our crews as well as the victims.” WIRED obtained an audio recording of the meeting. Officials from San Francisco and Austin, where Waymo has been ferrying passengers without drivers for more than a year, said the vehicles’ performance is getting worse. “We are actually seeing something interesting: backsliding of some things that had improved upon,” Mary Ellen Carroll, the executive director of San Francisco’s Department of Emergency Management, told officials with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which oversees self-driving vehicle safety in the US. “They are committing more traffic violations .” “We’ve seen some behavior we haven’t seen in a few years … Waymo is frequently now blocking our fire stations from access,” added Chief Patrick Rabbitt, the head of the San Francisco Fire Department. “Their default is to freeze.” The situation can prevent firetrucks from responding to emergencies in a “timely and appropriate” way, he said. In Austin, first responders have been frequently stymied by Waymos “freezing up,” said Lieutenant William White, head of Highway Enforcement Command at the Austin Police Department. White said that, contrary to what Waymo had told first responders, the vehicles often fail to recognize or respond to officers’ hand signals, which can lead to cascading delays during emergencies or unusual road incidents. “I believe the technology was deployed too quickly in too vast amounts, with hundreds of vehicles, when it wasn’t really ready,” White said. NHTSA did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment. The complaints come as Waymo embarks on an ambitious expansion across the US and the world. Today, the company offers driverless rides in parts of 10 US cities, with plans to launch service in 10 more before the end of the year, including London. Waymo said last month that it’s now providing 500,000 paid rides weekly—a figure that’s still dwarfed by human-powered ride-hail services (Uber provides some 400 times that number weekly) but has grown tenfold since last year. But these comments from cities where the service is already operating threaten to slow the rollout of driverless technology, which, according to Waymo’s data , reduces serious crashes compared to human-driven cars. Waymo is already facing political opposition, especially from organized labor, in several dense, blue, and potentially lucrative cities, including Boston, New York City, Seattle, and Washington, DC. In a statement, Waymo spokesperson Julia Ilina wrote: “We deeply value our partnership with first responders and our shared commitment to safety. Their ongoing feedback has been instrumental in driving impactful improvements to the Waymo service.” The company says it has conducted in-person training for more than 35,000 emergency responders across the country. Public Comment Periods The comments made in the private meeting are blunter than what government officials have generally said in public. But they reflect long-simmering and sometimes vocal frustrations expressed by city leaders since at least late last year. Since autonomous vehicle operations are regulated in California and Texas by state rather than city officials, local first-responder departments and those who represent them can generally only request that developers like Waymo make specific changes to their operations. On Wednesday, Austin first responders appeared before the City Council to discuss Waymo’s response to an incident last month in which a driverless vehicle blocked an ambulance for two minutes that was responding to a shooting in the city’s downtown, which killed three people and injured at least 14. Though officers were able to connect quickly with Waymo operators to move the vehicle, they reported that it had taken up to three minutes to connect with a remote agent in the past. They reiterated that Waymos don’t always respond well to hand signals, especially ones from police mounted on motorcycles. Waymo declined to attend the meeting, and two front-row chairs labeled “RESERVED FOR: WAYMO” remained empty throughout the two-hour session. Ilina, the Waymo spokesperson, said the company has "already had the substantive conversations this moment calls for,” and said the company has answered questions from city officials. “We will keep working with Austin's leadership and first-responder community, because ongoing collaboration is how we build the trust this city deserves and make Austin’s streets safer,” she wrote. Austin’s Independent School District has also complained in the last few months about Waymo operations , after several incidents where driverless vehicles passed school buses picking up or dropping off schoolchildren with their stop arms extended and alert lights on. In San Francisco, Carroll, the emergency management head, testified before the City Council last month about a widespread December power outage that left more than a thousand Waymos stranded for at least a few minutes as they struggled to navigate intersections without traffic signals. More than 60 Waymos had to be retrieved manually during the three-hour blackout, Waymo later reported. “I definitely stay awake at night thinking about things that could happen and how we integrate this new technology,” Carroll told city leaders. In at least one instance, she reported, a 911 operator waited on Waymo’s hotline for 53 minutes. “Anything that brings a high volume of calls to 911 around these kinds of things can delay response, delay our call time for people that have true life-and-death situations,” she said. Waymo says it has changed some internal policies and increased engagement and training with first responders following the power outage. Jackie Thornhill, a spokesperson for the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management (DEM), wrote in a statement to WIRED: “Since the [December] outage, DEM and Waymo have engaged in productive conversations to improve our communication and establish clear paths for issue escalation.” She said the agency would “continue to coordinate clear lines of communication” between safety agencies and the private sector. Sadot Azzua, a spokesperson for the Austin Police Department, said in a written statement that the department is “actively engaging with city partners to assess various situations involving autonomous vehicles.” The Human Element First responders’ comments to federal regulators in last month’s private meeting zeroed in on what they called Waymo’s “human element”—the remote support teams meant to quickly respond to safety-related requests from first responders and riders alike. Assistant chief Nicole Jones of the San Francisco Police Department said officers were frustrated that they had to stick their heads into robotaxis to speak with Waymo’s remote operators, who sometimes can help the vehicles navigate out of tricky situations from afar. Jones said her department has advocated for exterior microphones that allow officers to speak to Waymo workers from outside the cars. White, the Austin police official, said Waymos can get stuck when they’re forced to interact with people. “The human element is what’s killing them,” he says. “The moment you introduce the human element, [the vehicles] lack that social awareness of what to do, and they freeze.” Freezing creates “a significant danger to public safety,” he told federal regulators. On Tuesday, California’s Department of Motor Vehicles published new autonomous vehicle regulations that could solve some of the first responders’ issues. The