메뉴
BL
404 Media • 31일 전

3D프린터 제작 '가짜' Flock 카메라 파손한 남성, 중범죄 3개로 기소

IMP
5/10
핵심 요약

미국 플로리다 오비에도 경찰이 경찰관이 집에서 3D프린터로 만든 '미끼용' 가짜 Flock 감시카메라로 파손 행위를 유인한 뒤, 이를 절단·파괴한 남성을 중범죄 3개 혐의로 기소했습니다. 몇 달러짜리 플라스틱 장치에 불과했지만 시장조차 몰랐던 이 함정 수사는 경찰이 Flock 카메라 파손 시도를 잡기 위해 얼마나 적극적으로 나섰는지 보여주며, 정보공개 요구에도 경찰이 전 과정을 비공개로 하고 있어 논란이 되고 있습니다.

번역된 본문

플로리다의 한 경찰서가 경찰관이 집에서 3D프린터로 제작한 '미끼(decoy)' Flock 카메라를 이용해 파손 시도자를 유인했다. 경찰은 며칠 동안 이 가짜 카메라을 감시하다가, 한 남성이 플라스틱 장치 하나를 잘라내고 파괴하자 그에게 중범죄 3개 혐의를 적용했다. 해당 경찰서는 이 미끼 작전이 어떻게 기획·실행되었는지에 대한 어떠한 정보도 공개를 거부하고 있으며, 이 작전과 관련된 문서가 전혀 없다고 주장한다. 플로리다 오비에도 시장 메건 슬라데크는 이 사실을 "전혀 몰랐다"며 뉴스 6 올랜도가 처음 보도한 이 함정 수사에 대해 "말문이 막혔다"고 밝혔다. 이 체포는 경찰이 Flock 카메라 파손자를 잡으려는 시도가 격화되었으며, 일부 부서가 이를 위해 상당한 자원을 투입하고 있음을 보여준다. 슬라데크는 404 미디어에 문제의 3D프린팅 카메라는 '무료'였다고 말했다. 이 미끼 카메라의 가치가 기껏해야 몇 달러어치 플라스틱 필라멘트에 불과했음에도, 에반 메이어는 404 미디어가 입수한 체포 보고서에 따르면 미수 절도/대량 절도, 1,000달러를 초과하는 재산 손괴, 컴퓨터 장비에 대한 재산범죄 등 중범죄 3개 혐의로 기소되었다. 체포 보고서에 따르면 이 작전은 7월 말과 8월 초 오비에도에서 Flock 카메라 여러 대가 도난당한 이후에 기획되었다. 보고서는 "2026년 7월 23일부터 8월 3일 사이 록우드 대로 일대에서 우리의 Flock 세이프티 카메라 여러 대가 도난당했고, 우리는 이를 클론형 Flock 카메라로 교체했다. 이 Flock '미끼' 카메라는 실제 Flock 카메라와 매우 유사하게 만들어졌지만 비용이 같지 않았고 기기 내 어떠한 데이터도 수집하지 않았다"고 명시하고 있다. 메이어는 목요일 자정 직후, 정원용 전지가위로 3D프린팅 가짜 카메라를 폴대에서 잘라내고 파괴한 형의로 체포되었다. 경찰 보고서는 "카메라 교체 비용이 얼마나 들 것이라고 생각하는지 묻자 그는 약 1,000~5,000달리라고 답했으며, 이는 메이어가 이것이 가짜 복제품이 아니라 비싼 실제 장비라는 것을 알고 있었음을 입증한다"고 적고 있다. "우리 Flock 카메라의 실제 교체 비용은 설치비를 제외하고 800달러로 평가된다. 메이어는 Flock 카메라의 남용(특히 Flock 세이프티 CEO)에 관한 온라인의 부정적인 이야기를 접해왔으며, 집에서 가장 가까운 카메라를 뽑아버리기로 했다고 진술했다. 메이어는 차고에서 아버지의 전지가위를 가져와 집에서 남쪽으로 거리를 걸어내려갔고, 키가 충분히 커서 마운트를 잘라낸 뒤 카메라를 땅에 부숴버렸다." 체포 보고서는 메이어가 Flock 카메라가 비싸다고 생각했고 미끼라는 것을 몰랐기 때문에 더 무거운 처벌을 수반하는 미수 대량 절도 등의 혐의로 기소될 수 있음을 시사한다. 이 작전은 몇 년 전 여러 경찰서가 시도했던 아마존 '택배 함정 수사'를 연상시킨다. 당시 경찰은 빈 아마존 상자를 사람들 현관에 놓고 지켜보았으며, 그 함정 수사에서 알려진 체포는 단 한 건도 없었다. 오비에도 경찰서는 지금까지 경찰 보고서에 언급된 내용 외에 이 작전에 관한 거의 모든 정보 공개를 거부해왔으며, 404 미디어에 가짜 카메라 제작 방법에 관한 공공기록은 진행 중인 형사사건과 관련이 있으므로 공개할 의무가 없다고 반복적으로 주장했다. 이 부서는 처음에는 체포 이전의 가짜 장치에 관한 공공기록이 전혀 없다고 주장했다가, 이후 모든 기록이 공개 면제 대상이라고 주장했다. 오비에도 경찰서 대변인은 404 미디어에 "미끼 FLOCK 카메라는 한 경찰관이 자신의 개인 3D프린터로 자택에서 제작하여 당국에 기증한 것이다. 우리 당국은 3D프린터를 보유하고 있지 않으므로 체포 이전의 해당 미끼 또는 복제 카메라의 설계, 기획, 제작과 관련한 기록, 통신, 프레젠테이션 등을 보유하고 있지 않다"고 말했다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
A police department in Florida used “decoy” Flock cameras that an officer 3D-printed at home to “bait” would-be vandals. Police officers monitored the fake cameras for days, then charged a man with three felonies after he cut down and destroyed one of the plastic devices. The police department in question refuses to release any information about how the decoy operation was devised or carried out and claims there is zero paper trail whatsoever about the operation. Oviedo, Florida mayor Megan Sladek said she “had NO idea” that this was happening and said she was “speechless” over the sting operation, which was first reported by News 6 Orlando . The arrest shows that police have escalated their attempts to catch potential Flock vandals, and that some departments have dedicated significant resources into doing so. Sladek told 404 Media that the 3D-printed camera in question was “free.” Despite the decoy camera being worth, at most, several dollars worth of plastic filament, Evan Meyer was charged with three felonies: attempted larceny/grand theft, criminal mischief of property damage worth more than $1,000, and property crimes against computer equipment supplies, according to an arrest report obtained by 404 Media. The arrest report states that the operation was devised after several Flock cameras in Oviedo were stolen in late July and early August. “Several of our Flock Safety cameras were stolen between 7/23/2026 -8/3/2026 out of the Lockwood Blvd. corridor and we replaced them with clone style Flock cameras. These Flock ‘bait’ cameras were made to closely resemble that of real Flock cameras but did not cost the same amount nor collect any data within the device,” the arrest report states. Meyer was arrested shortly after midnight Thursday after knocking the 3D-printed fake camera off a pole with a pair of garden shears and destroying it. “When asked how much he believes the camera costs to replace, he stated approximately $1,000-$5,000 proving that Meyer knew it was an expensive real piece of equipment and not a fake replica,” the police report states. “The actual cost to replace our Flock camera is valued at $800.00 plus any installation fees. Meyer advised he has been hearing all the negative things online about the misuses of Flock cameras (specifically the CEO of Flock Safety) and decided to knock the one down which was closest to his house. Meyer grabbed his father's pruning shears from the garage, walked down the street (south from his house) and was tall enough to cut the mount off and then smashed the camera on the ground.” The arrest report implies that because Meyer thought that Flock cameras were expensive and because he didn’t know it was a decoy that he could be charged with attempted grand theft and other charges that carry more consequences. The operation is reminiscent of Amazon “package sting” operations that several police departments attempted several years ago, in which empty Amazon boxes were placed on people’s porches while police officers watched. Those sting operations resulted in zero known arrests. The Oviedo Police Department has thus far refused to release almost any information about the operation outside of what was said in the police report, and has repeatedly claimed to 404 Media that public records about how the fake camera were made do not have to be released because they have to do with an ongoing criminal investigation. The department first claimed that it has zero public records whatsoever about the fake device from before the arrest, then claimed that any and all records are exempt from release. A representative for the Oviedo Police Department told 404 Media that “The decoy FLOCK camera was produced by an officer at their home using their personally owned 3D printer and donated to the agency Our agency does not own a 3D printer therefore does not have design, planning and creation of the alleged decoy or replica cameras before the arrest, including the communications and presentations through which that work was discussed.” It said there are “no meeting minutes, no text messages, and no emails regarding the production of a decoy FLOCK camera prior to the arrest on 8/20/2026.” Mayor Sladek posted on Facebook that she was “speechless” over the operation, and that “transparency is so important.” "My 2 cents: there are 2 completely separate issues in play here, and they're tangled up in an unfortunate way. ISSUE 1: VANDALISM IS WRONG. I don't care if it's a Flock camera, a piece of art, or graffiti in a public space, it's not right. The police caught a person who engaged in destroying public property, and that's what we hired them to do. They did their job,” she wrote. “ISSUE 2: on Monday, just days before this incident, a majority of COUNCIL AGREED TO CONSIDER ENDING FLOCK. There is a timeline of events related to installing decoy cameras, and somewhere in that timeline, City Council instructed staff to prepare a resolution to end the use of Flock in Oviedo. While it is irrelevant to the issue of vandalism, when the fake cameras were fabricated and installed relative to a very public discussion about their potential discontinuation is something I would like to know.” In an email to 404 Media, Sladek said that “the whole thing is very interesting from a legal perspective. Mayor is a part-time job here in Oviedo, and I'm an attorney by day, so I'm probably looking at this with a bit different lens than the average person. Even if the guy knew it was a fake camera, that would still make it art, and it would still be vandalism.” “I became aware of the camera's existence when I heard about it from a resident who saw it on the news, and shortly after that, my first questions were about the cost and process,” she added. “Can't do much better than free, and the effort did result in someone hopping up a pole and attempting to take it down. What is not known is whether the person who removed the first camera at that location is the same as the person who removed the decoy. It would be interesting to know if the one arrested has any prior criminal history or if this was a first offense. How to charge is up to the state's attorney, but you'll see on the police report when it arrives that the person arrested believed that he was damaging property valued at a much greater price point than the actual value was. “ In a Facebook comment, Sladek posted several responses to questions that Oviedo police chief Dale Coleman gave her. Coleman said that he approved the plan, and that “supervisors have latitude how they go about solving a crime operations [sic] like this are done whenever there is a reasonable chance of success. This operation is similar to a drug operation or a theft ring at the mall. CID has done this many of these and know what is needed to do it lawfully.” Coleman told Sladek that there were multiple cameras installed last Sunday, and said that police officers were watching the cameras all night between Sunday and Thursday, when Meyer was arrested. It is not clear which 3D printed plastic Flock camera model the police officer used, but 404 Media found various Flock camera replicas on popular free 3D printer model sites. About the author Jason is a cofounder of 404 Media. He was previously the editor-in-chief of Motherboard. He loves the Freedom of Information Act and surfing. More from Jason Koebler