크레이그즐리스트(Craigslist)의 창립자인 크레이그 뉴마크(Craig Newmark)가 지난 30년간 자선 단체에 5억 달러 이상을 기부하며 기부 문화를 강조했습니다. 이는 최근 부를 과시하고 이기적인 행보를 보이는 다른 억만장자들과의 대조를 이룹니다. 그는 찰스 스왑 등에서 배운 도덕적 가치관을 바탕으로, 누구도 너무 많은 돈을 가질 필요가 없다며 재산 대부분을 사회에 환원하는 것이 옳다고 강조했습니다.
번역된 본문
크레이그즐리스트(Craigslist)의 창립자이자 억만장자인 크레이그 뉴마크(Craig Newmark)는 입을 다물지 못하는 오랜 버릇이 있으며, 이로 인해 몇 가지 '영향력 있는 실수'를 저질렀다고 시인합니다. 하지만 그는 30년 전 중고 거래 사이트를 설립한 이래 자선 단체에 5억 달러를 기부한 것이나, 막대한 부를 가진 다른 사람들도 같은 길을 걷기를 바란다는 자신의 발언이 판단 착오라고 생각하지 않습니다. 최근 몇 년간 미국에서는 자선 활동보다는 철저한 개인주의와 과시적인 부의 과시로의 변화가 일어나고 있으며, 이는 최고 권력자들 사이에서도 마찬가지입니다. 도널드 트럼프(Donald Trump) 대통령은 두 번째 임기 동안 순자산을 43억 달러에서 73억 달러로 늘렸고, 백악관 무도회장에 6억 달러를 쓸 계획이며, 수도 곳곳을 화려하게 치장하고 있습니다. 억만장자 벤처 캐피털리스트인 피터 틸(Peter Thiel)은 올해 초 뉴욕타임스(The New York Times)에 자신이 부유한 동료들에게 '기빙 플레지(The Giving Pledge, 초부유층이 평생에 걸쳐 막대한 금액을 기부하도록 장려하는 오랜 자선 캠페인)에 대한 약속을 취소하도록 권장해 왔다고 말했습니다. 로이터(Reuters)에 제공된 녹취록에 따르면, 틸은 기부금이 '좌파' 비영리 단체로 흘러갈 것이라고 주장하며 이를 '에프스타인과 관련된 가짜 베이비붐 세대 클럽'이라고 불렀습니다. 뉴마크는 작년에 기빙 플레지에 서명했으며, 최근 뉴욕타임스 칼럼에서 틸과 다른 억만장자들의 입장에 어떻게 어리둥절해졌는지 작성했습니다. 그는 "1990년대 중반 크레이그즐리스트를 시작했을 때 부자가 될 거라고 생각하지 못했습니다. 하지만 그렇게 되었습니다. 그 무렵 기술 업계의 많은 사람들도 운이 좋았습니다. 적절한 시간에 적절한 장소에 있는 것만으로 수백만—심지어 수십억—의 돈이 만들어졌죠"라고 썼습니다. "그것은 누구에게든 너무 많은 돈이기에, 저는 그 돈의 대부분을 필요로 하는 사람들과 사업에 기부하고 있습니다. 이런 돈을 가진 다른 사람들이 누군가 이런 일을 하는 것을 비판하는 것은 저에게 전혀 이해가 되지 않습니다." 74세의 뉴마크는 돈을 기부하고 싶어 하지 않는 다른 부유층을 판단하지는 않지만, 그럼에도 그들의 결정을 이해하기 어렵다고 인디펜던트(The Independent)에 말했습니다. 그는 "모든 사람은 자신의 도덕적 결정을 내려야 합니다. 자신만의 결정을 내린 눈에 띄는 초부유층이 있으며, 그런 결정을 내릴 권리가 있습니다. 난 그냥 정말 이해하지 못할 뿐입니다."라고 말했습니다. 그 자신의 재정적 결정은 뉴저지주 모리스타운에 있는 유대인 커뮤니티 센터의 교실에 뿌리를 두고 있습니다. 1950년대 후반, 6살이었던 뉴마크는 홀로코스트 생존자인 라파엘 레빈과 레이첼 레빈의 일요학교에 다녔으며, 친절이 부보다 더 중요하다는 교훈을 결코 잊지 않았습니다. 그는 "그들은 저에게 내가 대접받고 싶은 대로 사람을 대하라고 말했습니다."라고 했습니다. "충분할 때가 충분하다는 것을 알아야 합니다. 그리고 형제의, 혹은 자매의 지킴이가 되어야 한다고 했습니다. 그것은 저에게 의미가 다가왔습니다." 이러한 감정은 그가 미국은행(Bank of America)과 찰스 스왑(Charles Schwab)에서 소프트웨어 엔지니어로 일하던 초기 경력 시절부터, 1996년 예기치 않게 인기를 끌게 된 중고 거래 사이트인 크레이그즐리스트를 출시한 후에도 그와 함께했습니다. 이 사이트는 샌프란시스코에 살던 뉴마크가 친구들에게 보내던 예정된 행사를 자세히 적은 주간 이메일로 시작되었습니다. 시간이 지나면서 이 이메일은 자동차와 무료 소파부터 일자리 및 행사까지 모든 것을 나열하는 중고 거래 사이트로 변모했습니다. 1999년, 크레이그즐리스트가 크게 성공하면서 뉴마크는 이를 '진짜' 회사로 만들어야 한다는 것을 깨달았습니다. 하지만 주로 자원봉사자로 구성된 팀과 함께 성장하는 사이트를 관리하는 방법을 몰랐고, 프로그래머와 고객 서비스와 같은 유급 직원이 필요했습니다. 뉴마크에게는 자금을 위해 벤처 캐피털리스트와 은행가들에게 아부하고, 비즈니스 모델을 바꾸어 부자가 되거나, 자신만의 방식으로 하는 선택지가 있었습니다. 그는 "업계 행사에서 만난 벤처 캐피털리스트(VC)들과 은행가들은 저에게 수십억 달러의 큰 돈을 쏟아붓고 싶다고 말했습니다."라고 말했습니다. "하지만 그렇게 하려면 평소 실리콘밸리에서 하는 일을 해야 했고, 그들은 사이트를 철저하게 수익화할 것이며, 그곳은 아주 다른 곳이 되었을 것입니다." 아마도 사람들에게 요금을 부과하게 만들었을 모델에 굴복하기보다는...
C raig Newmark, multimillionaire founder of Craigslist , has long had trouble keeping his mouth shut – leading to some “influential mistakes”, he readily admits. But he doesn’t consider it a lapse in judgement that he’s given away half a billion dollars to charity since founding the classified ads site 30 years ago – nor voicing his hope that others with vast fortunes will take a similar tack. There has been a shift away from philanthropy toward hard-edged individualism and ostentatious displays of wealth in America in recent years, even in the highest office. President Donald Trump has increased his net worth from $4.3 billion to $7.3 billion during his second term, plans to spend $600 million on the White House ballroom and is gilding the capital at every turn. Billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel told The New York Times earlier this year that he had been encouraging wealthy peers to undo commitments to The Giving Pledge, a longstanding philanthropic campaign that encourages the ultra-rich to give away vast sums during their lifetime to causes of their choosing. Thiel claimed contributions would go to “left-wing” nonprofits, according to an audio transcript provided to Reuters, and dubbed it an “Epstein-adjacent fake Boomer club.” Newmark signed The Giving Pledge last year and recently wrote a New York Times op-ed on how he was dumbfounded by Thiel and some other billionaires’ positions. “When I started Craigslist in the mid-1990s, I never thought I’d become rich. But I did. A lot of people in tech around that time also got lucky. Millions – even billions – were made simply by being in the right place at the right time,” he wrote. “That’s too much money for anyone to have, so I’m giving most of it away to people and causes that need it. It makes no sense to me that others with this kind of money would criticize anyone doing this.” Newmark, 74 , told The Independent that he doesn’t judge other wealthy people who don’t want to give their money away but nevertheless finds their decisions hard to fathom. “Everyone has to make their own moral decisions,” he said . “There are some highly visible, super-rich people who've made their own decisions, and it's their right to make those decisions. I just don't really understand.” His own financial decisions are rooted in a classroom at the Jewish Community Center in Morristown, New Jersey. It’s there that six-year-old Newmark attended the Sunday school of Holocaust survivors Rafael and Rachel Levin in the late Fifties, and never forgot the lesson that kindness was more important than riches. “They told me that I should treat people like I want to be treated,” he said. “I should know when enough is enough. And they told me I should be my brother's keeper or my sister's keeper. And that made sense to me.” The sentiment remained with him early in his career when he was a software engineer at Bank of America and Charles Schwab, and even after he launched his unexpectedly popular classifieds site Craigslist in 1996. The site started as a weekly email detailing upcoming events that Newmark would send to friends while living in San Francisco. Over time, the email transformed into a classifieds site with listings for everything from cars and free couches to jobs and events. In 1999, Craigslist took off and Newmark realized he had to turn it into a “real” company. But he didn’t know how to manage the growing site with a team mainly made up of volunteers, and he needed paid staff, such as programmers and customer service. Newmark had a choice – get cozy with venture capitalists and bankers for funding, change the business model and get rich, or do it his way. “The VCs and bankers I met at industry events said they wanted to throw huge amounts of money at me – billions,” he said. “But I'd have to do the usual Silicon Valley thing and they would then monetize the site thoroughly, and it would become a very different place.” Rather than succumb to a model that likely would have charged people for listings, Newmark chose to charge businesses for their posts but kept Craigslist free for the average user. Craigslist grew into an amazing success story, loved for its simple design and quirky listings, and remains among the top-500 most visited websites in the world. More than 100 million users visited Craiglist in April, according to web analytics firm Semrush . While Newmark said he was never a billionaire, his wealth could have bought a fleet of luxury vehicles, superyacht and homes on each continent. But aside from an occasional lavish meal, he says the trappings of extreme wealth held little pull for him. He doesn’t own a car and takes public transportation in New York City. His typical day consists of work meetings, coffee with friends, feeding a pair of neighborhood pigeons he’s named Mr. and Mrs. Hatbird, reading science fiction and watching TV at night with his wife of 14 years, Eileen, who runs an apartment co-op in New York City. “I realized I [didn’t] have to make much money to be happy,” Newmark said. “As a nerd, I was oblivious to the social cues people use to indicate what they're about. had no interest in prestige or status items. Even now, I’m not comfortable with prestige or status.” In 2015, he started Craig Newmark Philanthropies. Through the organization, Newmark donates to causes in areas that interest him, such as cybersecurity, journalism, military families and veterans, and even pigeon rescue. His work with organizations like Blue Star Families, which helps military families find support and build relationships wherever they’re stationed, is a way to honor his dad, who served in the Army in Second World War and died from cancer when Newmark was 13. Newmark also joined The Giving Pledge, started by Microsoft billionaire Warren Buffet and Bill and Melinda Gates in 1996, to encourage the world’s richest people to give away at least half of their fortunes during their lifetime. Members of the pledge include OpenAI founder Sam Altman and husband Oliver Mulherin, philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and wife Michelle Yee. At first, Newmark couldn’t sign the pledge because he wasn’t a billionaire, he said, but the initiative subsequently expanded its membership and he joined in 2025. He described it as a surreal moment, because he never set out to be rich, but he was standing up for “regular people who want to share,” he said. “The Giving Pledge matched my values,” Newmark said. “I could make a statement putting my money where my mouth is, and that would be a good thing.“ Altruistic as the initiative may seem, it’s received a fair amount of criticism over the past few years. Coinbase cofounder Brian Armstrong took the unprecedented step of withdrawing his pledge, according to Forbes , while Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison had amended his pledge to include for-profit work. Thiel, in particular, has openly discouraged people from signing the pledge and has pushed participants to leave it, according to The New York Times . Thiel claimed in audio transcripts provided to Reuters in March that he told Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, not to sign the pledge because his contributions would go to “left-wing” nonprofits of Bill Gates’ choosing. Thiel’s claim contradicts the The Pledge’s policies , which state that donors choose where the money goes and “they pursue their philanthropy independently.” Newmark expressed concern about the backlash in a opinion piece for The Times a few weeks later. “It’s bizarre to me that the pledge has now come under attack by some tech billionaires who say we’re giving our money away foolishly, or complain that the money is going to left-wing nonprofits. I don’t understand the critics’ logic, but politics and that sort of criticism have never really made much sense to me,” he wrote. The piece touched a nerve with people across social media. “Always grateful for your moral clarity, as ever,” LinkedIn user Anil Dash wrote in response to Newmark’s op