메뉴
HN
Hacker News • 36일 전

블랙박스 체커: MLC의 6억5천6백만 달러 미수령 로열티 확인하기

IMP
6/10
핵심 요약

미국 음악저작권 단체 The MLC에는 매칭되지 않아 아무도 찾아가지 않은 6억5천6백만 달러의 '블랙박스' 기계적 로열티가 쌓여 있습니다. 이 무료 도구는 Spotify 아티스트 링크만 입력하면 자신의 음원 중 등록·청구되지 않은 것이 무엇인지, 대략 얼마의 손실인지 확인해줍니다. 2027년 초부터 미수령 금액이 시장 점유율에 따라 기존 수령자들에게 분배되며 사실상 소멸하므로, 지금 확인하고 등록하는 것이 중요합니다.

번역된 본문

블랙박스 체커(Blackbox Checker)

The MLC에서 당신의 음원 중 등록되지 않았거나 청구되지 않은 것이 무엇인지, 그리고 그것이 대략 얼마의 손실인지 확인해보세요. Spotify 아티스트, 앨범 또는 곡 링크를 붙여넣거나 이름으로 검색하세요. 무료이며 가입이 필요 없습니다.

블랙박스에서 돈을 되찾는 첫걸음

The MLC는 아무도 청구하지 않은 6억5천6백만 달러를 보유하고 있습니다. 그중 2021년 1월분 첫 641만 달러는 146일 07시간 33분 46초 후 시장 점유율에 따라 지급될 예정입니다. 이는 The MLC가 공식 집계한, 아직 매칭되지 않거나 청구되지 않은 가장 오래된 이용 월분입니다. 이 돈은 이미 로열티를 수령 중인 퍼블리셔와 작곡가들에게 기존 수령액 비율대로 분배되며, 일단 지급되고 나면 끝입니다. 당신 이름이 해당 작품에 등재되어 있지 않으면 한 푼도 돌아오지 않습니다. The MLC는 2027년 1월부터 시작한다고 밝혔으며, 1월 분배일은 14일이므로 카운트다운이 그 시점을 기준으로 진행됩니다.

각 상태의 의미

✓ 정상: MLC에서 작품과 연결되어 있고 모든 지분이 청구됨. 할 일 없음.

◈ 매칭 필요: MLC는 각 서비스의 음원 사본을 작품과 개별적으로 매칭합니다. 따라서 Spotify, Apple, Pandora는 각각 별도의 매칭입니다. 대부분은 매칭되었으나 일부가 안 되었고, 그 뒤에 돈이 쌓여 있는 상태. 흔한 경우이며 보통 마지막에 남는 문제입니다.

◐ 지분 누락: 작품과 연결되어 있으나 일부 지분에 소유자가 없어 해당 부분이 블랙박스에 누적되고 있음. 반드시 잘못된 것은 아닙니다. 다른 사람과 공동 작곡했다면 청구되지 않은 부분은 단순히 그 사람 몫일 수 있습니다.

○ 완전 미청구: 작품과 연결되어 있으나 아무도 청구하지 않음. 해당 곡의 모든 기계적 로열티가 미배분 상태로 남아 있음.

✕ 작품 누락: MLC에 이 음원은 있으나 뒷받침되는 작품이 없어 돈을 지급할 대상이 없음. 작품이 이미 등록되었으나 이 음원에 연결되지 않았거나, 아예 등록되지 않았을 수 있습니다.

– MLC 데이터에 없음: 이 음원이 MLC 데이터베이스에 아예 없는 상태로, 보통 스트리밍 서비스가 아직 리포트하지 않았기 때문입니다. 지금 작품을 등록하면 나중에 리포트가 들어올 때 돈이 블랙박스가 아닌 올바른 곳으로 갑니다.

자주 묻는 질문

'블랙박스' 돈이란 무엇인가? 모든 스트리밍은 두 가지 로열티를 발생시킵니다. 하나는 음원(레코딩)에 대한 것이고, 다른 하나는 그 아래에 있는 작품, 즉 작곡(composition)에 대한 것입니다. 미국에서 후자는 음악현대화법(Music Modernization Act)에 따라 설립된 비영리단체인 The Mechanical Licensing Collective가 작곡가에게 기계적 로열티(mechanical royalties)를 지급하기 위해 수집합니다. 음원을 작품과 매칭할 수 없거나, 작품에 아무도 청구하지 않은 지분이 있어도 돈은 계속 들어옵니다. 다만 나가지 않을 뿐입니다. 이 돈은 업계에서 '블랙박스'라 부르는 미배분 풀에 쌓입니다. 이 도구는 당신의 카탈로그 중 얼마가 그곳에 갇혀 있는지 보여줍니다.

왜 이 돈이 위험하며, 금액은 어떻게 산출했는가? 이 돈이 The MLC에 영원히 있지는 않기 때문입니다. 2027년 초부터 매칭·청구되지 않고 누적된 로열티를 시장 점유율에 따라, 이미 수령 중인 퍼블리셔와 작곡가에게 기존 수익 비율대로 분배하기 시작합니다. 가장 오래된 이용 월부터 순서대로 지급되며, 한 달분이 분배되고 나면 그것으로 끝입니다. 청구와 매칭은 무기한 열려 있으므로 지금 수정하면 아직 지급되지 않은 모든 월분을 보호할 수 있지만, 당신 이름이 음원에 없는 채로 한 달이 지날 때마다 그 달의 로열티는 다른 사람에게 넘어갑니다.

금액 산출 방법: Spotify 스트리밍 수를 가져와 전체 서비스 규모로 추정하고, 미국 몫을 뽑아 미국 기계적 로열티 요율을 곱합니다. 그런 다음 실제로 위험에 노출된 부분만 남깁니다. 보통은 작품의 미청구 지분입니다. 작품이 완전히 청구되었더라도 MLC가 Spotify의 음원 사본을 매칭하지 못한 경우, 해당 재생 뒤의 돈도 갈 곳이 없으므로 할인하지 않습니다. 스트리밍당 요율은 MLC 분배액과 과거 CRB Phonorecords 요율에서 측정했으며, 실제 지급액으로 검증했을 때 약 절반 수준의 요율이 나왔습니다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Blackbox Checker See which of your recordings are unregistered or unclaimed at The MLC, and roughly what that's costing you. Paste a Spotify artist, album or song link , or search by name: Spotify artist, album or song link, or an artist name Check my catalog → Free, no signup required. First money out of the black box The MLC is holding $656M nobody has claimed. The first $6.41M of it, from January 2021, gets paid out to market share in 146 days 07 hrs 33 min 46 sec The MLC's own figure for the oldest usage month still unmatched or unclaimed. It goes to the publishers and writers already collecting, in proportion to what they already collect, and once it has gone out it is gone. None of it reaches you unless your name is on the work. The MLC has said it starts in January 2027, and their January distribution date is the 14th, so that is where the clock runs. What each status means ✓ Looks good Linked to a work at the MLC with every share claimed. Nothing to do here. ◈ Needs matching The MLC matches each service's copy of a recording to your work separately, so Spotify, Apple and Pandora are three different matches. Most of yours landed and a few didn't, and money is sitting behind the ones that didn't. Common, and usually the last thing left. ◐ Missing shares Linked to a work, but some of it has no owner attached and that slice is accruing in the black box. Not always wrong: if you wrote with other people, the unclaimed part may simply be theirs. ○ Fully unclaimed Linked to a work, but nobody has claimed any of it. All of its mechanicals are sitting unallocated. ✕ Missing work The MLC has this recording and no work behind it, so there is nothing for the money to be paid against. The work may already be registered and simply not attached to this recording, or it may not be there at all. – Not in MLC data This recording doesn't appear in the MLC database at all, usually because the streaming services haven't reported it yet. Register the work now and the money lands somewhere when they do, instead of in the black box. Questions What is “black box” money? + Every stream generates two royalties. One is for the recording, the other for the work underneath it, meaning the composition. In the US that second one is collected by The Mechanical Licensing Collective, a non-profit set up under the Music Modernization Act to pay mechanical royalties to songwriters. When they cannot match a recording to its work, or the work has shares nobody has claimed, the money still comes in. It just never goes out. It sits in an unallocated pool the industry calls the black box. This tool shows you how much of your catalog is stuck there. Why is this money at risk, and how did you work out the number? + Because it does not sit at The MLC forever. Starting in early 2027 they begin distributing accrued royalties that were never matched or claimed, by market share, splitting them among the publishers and writers already collecting in proportion to what they already earn. It goes out oldest usage month first, and once a month has been distributed it is gone. Claiming and matching stay open indefinitely, so anything you fix now protects every month not yet paid out, but each month that passes with your name missing from a recording is a month of its royalties handed to somebody else. The MLC's own explanation ↗ How we size it. We take your Spotify stream count, estimate what that means across all services, take the US portion, and multiply by the US mechanical rate. Then we keep only the part that is actually exposed. Usually that is the unclaimed percentage of the work. Where the work is fully claimed but the MLC never matched Spotify's own copy of the recording to it, the money behind those plays has nowhere to go either, so none of it is discounted. The per-stream rate is measured from MLC distributions and historical CRB Phonorecords rates. We checked it against catalogs we administer, where the rate implied by actual payments came out around half the headline figure, so we use the measured one instead. The MLC also publishes its own ranking of what each unmatched recording is worth, and we read that too. Where their figure is larger than ours, we use theirs. We never add the two together, because they are two estimates of the same money rather than two piles of it. This mostly shows up on quieter recordings, where a handful of streams tells us very little and The MLC is holding real money anyway, and on recordings we have no stream count for at all. It is a range rather than a single number, give or take 35%, because every other input is an industry average rather than something we measured for you. A trailing plus sign means the top of the range is open-ended: The MLC's highest band has no ceiling, so we cannot name one either. Treat it as an order of magnitude, not an invoice. My song is registered and fully claimed. Why does it say “Needs matching”? + Because the registration is only half of what has to be right. The other half is the link between that work and each recording of it, and there is not one of those links. There is one per service. The MLC matches each service's copy of a recording to a work separately. Your song on Spotify, the same song on Apple, and the same song again on Pandora are three different records in their database and three different matches. Usually they all find the same work. Sometimes one arrives with a slightly different title, a different duration, or no identifier, and sits unmatched while the work itself is registered with every share claimed. One song on a catalog we checked had 48 such copies across 13 services, worth over a thousand dollars, behind a work that was in perfect order. So both things are true at once, and The MLC's own data says so: it returns this recording as registered and unmatched in the same breath. That is why it gets its own status here rather than being filed under either one. A few stragglers is normal and it is not a sign anything is wrong with your paperwork. There is nothing to fix in your registration and nothing to change about your shares. The single step is the Matching Tool in the portal, which is usually the last thing standing between a catalog and being finished. What about covers? + The MLC pays the people who wrote a work, not the people who recorded it. If you released a cover, somebody else wrote it, so the publishing belongs to them and there is nothing at The MLC for you to claim on that recording. Your cover still earns mechanicals. They just belong to the original songwriter and their publisher. What you own is the recording, and those royalties reach you through your distributor instead. We check every recording on your Spotify profile, so covers appear in this report alongside everything else. Expand any row and choose "This is a cover or isn't mine" and we will drop it from the estimate and from the coverage figures. It works for anything on your profile you don't own, not only covers: a feature credited the wrong way round, a compilation appearance, a release that was never yours. The marks stay in your browser and travel with the link if you copy it, so the number you share is the corrected one. The gaps worth chasing are the works you wrote. Why only The MLC? + Because it is one clearly defined pool, and because the data is public. The MLC publishes its whole database every week, which is what makes a free tool like this possible. It is not the only place your money sits. Performance royalties from ASCAP, BMI and SESAC are separate. So are sync fees from film, TV and advertising, and collections from international societies like MCPS, GEMA and JASRAC. Master recording royalties are separate again, usually larger, and they reach you through your label or distributor rather than as a writer. We do check coverage across PROs and international societies for the catalogs we administer. None of that is in scope here. This tool does one thing (currently), on public data, for free. We are not