메뉴
HN
Hacker News • 54일 전

AI 거품 붕괴, 우리는 아직 모를 뿐이다

IMP
8/10
핵심 요약

빅테크 기업들의 실적 발표 시즌에서 AI 관련 막대한 자본 지출로 인해 메타(Meta)와 애플(Apple) 등의 현금 흐름이 감소하고 주가가 크게 요동치고 있습니다. 이는 거대 기술 기업들의 주식이 마치 소형 주식처럼 폭등락를 반복하며 시장의 불안감과 투기적 거품의 끝자락에 있음을 보여줍니다. IT 실무자들은 현재의 변동성 큰 시장 상황에서 선도적인 AI 모델이나 제품에 전면적으로 올인(All-in)하는 전략을 피하는 신중한 접근이 필요합니다.

번역된 본문

제목: AI 거품은 이미 꺼지고 있다, 우리는 아직 그 사실을 모를 뿐이다 출처: 해커뉴스 (hackernews)

본문: AI와 머신러닝 - AI 거품은 이미 꺼지고 있다, 우리는 아직 그 사실을 모를 뿐이다. The Register(더 레지스터)의 자체 제작 팟캐스트에서 기업 실적 발표를 둘러싼 기묘한 시간들에 대해 이야기해 보려 한다. (브랜든 비글리아로로, 정부 및 IT 뉴스 리포터, 2026년 8월 3일 월요일 // 12:53 UTC 게재)

[KETTLE 팟캐스트] 지난 2주 동안 빅테크 기업들의 2분기 실적이 쏟아지면서, 주식 시장 투자자들이 AI 거품에 비박기를 들이대는 것처럼 보인다. 이 페이지나 Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube에서 'The Kettle'의 최신 에피소드를 들을 수 있으며, 구독하면 알림을 받을 수 있다. 눈물 나는 자본 지출(Capex), 감소하는 잉여현금흐름(Free cash flow), 그리고 칩 가용성에 대한 우려 속에서 상황이 점차 악화되고 있다. 이번 'The Kettle' 에피소드에서는 매트 로소프(Matt Rosoff) 편집장과 토비아스 만(Tobias Mann) 시스템 에디터가 브랜든 비글리아로로(Brandon Vigliarolo) 진행자와 함께 이 수치들이 의미하는 바와 앞으로의 전개를 논의한다. (광고) 독자들에게 가장 중요한 점은, 이들이 이처럼 변동성이 큰 시장에서 IT 팀이 무엇을 해야 하는지에 대한 조언을 제공한다는 것이다. 힌트를 주자면, 기업 전체에 걸쳐 최첨단 AI 연구소(frontier lab) 제품에 모든 것을 걸고 올인하는 것은 아니다. (광고) 약간 편집된 대본은 아래에 포함되어 있다.

Brandon (00:01): The Register Kettle에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 저는 브랜든 비글리아로로입니다. 이번 주는 최근 기술 기업 실적이 이른바 AI 거품에 대해 우리에게 무엇을 말해주고 있는지에 대해 이야기할 것입니다. 이번 주에는 저와 함께 매트 로소프 편집장과 토비아스 만 시스템 에디터가 참석하여 숨겨져 있을지 모를 '거품 붕괴'라는 바늘을 찾기 위해 이 복잡한 실적 뉴스 더미를 파헤칠 것입니다. 두 분, 오셔서 감사합니다. Matt Rosoff (00:22): 감사합니다. Tobias Mann (00:23): 와서 기쁘네요.

Brandon (00:24): (광고) 지난주 보도된 바와 같이, 이번 분기 빅테크들의 실적은 호락호락하지 않은 오르내림의 연속이었습니다. 모든 것이 나빠 보이는 것은 아니지만, 그럼에도 불구하고 많은 투자자들이 현재 상황에 대해 상당히 우려하는 것 같습니다. 매트 님, 이 부분을 면밀히 지켜보셨는데요. 이를 분석해 주시고, 이 수치가 투자자와 AI 산업 상황에 무슨 의미인지 알려주실 수 있습니까? Matt Rosoff (00:46): 우리는 시장에서 종종 발생하는, 이른바 '거품'이라 불리는 투기적 시대의 마지막 단계에 접어든 것처럼 보입니다. 주가의 미친 듯한 변동성이 그 특징입니다. 이들은 동전주(Penny stocks, 소액 투기주)가 아닙니다. 시가총액이 어마어마한 거대 기술주들입니다. 애플은 메모리 및 기타 부품 가격이 너무 높아 다음 분기 실적이 기대에 미치지 못할 수 있다고 경고한 것만으로 오늘 주가가 10%나 하락했습니다. IBM은 최근 실적 경고 이후 단 하루 만에 1987년 블랙 먼데이 이후 가장 큰 가치 하락을 겪었습니다. 주식 시장 가치의 대부분을 차지하는 이들 거대 기술주들이 마치 소액 투기주처럼 움직이고 있는데, 이는 결코 좋은 징조가 아닙니다. 이는 보통 투자자들이 현재 상황을 어떻게 받아들여야 할지 모르고, 돈을 어디에 투자해야 할지 필사적으로 알아내려 할 때 나타나는 현상입니다. 그야말로 찻잎을 읽는 듯 불안한 상황이 계속되고 있습니다. 기업별 반응도 천차만별입니다. 메타(Meta)의 경우, 투자자들은 메타의 발표를 탐탁지 않게 여겼습니다. 새로운 데이터 센터를 구축하기 위한 막대한 자본 지출로 인해 현금 흐름이 급격히 감소했기 때문입니다. 이에 모두가 패닉에 빠져 대규모 매도가 일어났습니다.

Brandon (02:29): 자본 지출 규모 변화가 엄청났죠? 잉여현금흐름이 10억 달러 이하로 떨어졌습니다. 작년 이맘때는 85억 달러였는데요. 정말 큰 수치입니다. Matt Rosoff (02:37): 네, 이 모든 것은 AI와 관련된 무언가를 구축하기 위한 데이터 센터에 쓰인 돈입니다. 결국 메타의 마크 저커버그는 지금 최대한 시설을 구축해야 한다고 판단한 것 같습니다. AI가 광고 타겟팅과 핵심 비즈니스에 충분한 도움을 줘서 그 가치를 할 만할 것이며, 미래에는 남는 데이터 센터 용량을 임대할 수도 있을 것이라 본 것이죠. 하지만 이는 여전히 추측에 불과합니다.

Brandon (03:06): (광고) 맞습니다. Matt Rosoff (03:06): 요점은, 많은 투자자들이 불확실성 속에서 징조를 읽어내려 애쓰고 있다는 상황이라는 것입니다. 반면 오늘 아마존은 15%가 올랐습니다. 아마존 역시 자본 지출과 예상치가 상향 조정된 같은 이야기임에도 불구하고 말이죠.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
ai and ml The AI bubble is already popping; we just don't know it yet Weird times in earnings-land, and we're talking about it on The Reg's home grown podcast Brandon Vigliarolo Brandon Vigliarolo GOVERNMENT AND IT NEWS REPORTER Published mon 3 Aug 2026 // 12:53 UTC KETTLE Big tech's Q2 earnings have been pouring in over the last two weeks, and it looks like stock market investors are taking a pin to the AI bubble. You can listen to the latest episode of The Kettle right here on this page, as well as on Spotif y , Apple Music, or YouTube , where you can subscribe to get notified about the latest episode. Between eye-watering capex expenses, shrinking free cash flow, and worries about chip availability, things are starting to look tight. El Reg editor-in-chief Matt Rosoff and systems editor Tobias Mann join host Brandon Vigliarolo for this episode of The Kettle to discuss what the numbers mean and how things pan out. REG AD Most importantly for Reg readers, they also offer advice on what IT teams should do in such a volatile market. Hint: It doesn't involve going all in on frontier lab products across the enterprise. REG AD A lightly edited transcript is included below: Brandon (00:01) Welcome back to The Register Kettle. I'm Brandon Vigliarolo, and this week it's all about what the latest quarter of tech earnings are telling us about that AI bubble. With me this week is our editor-in-chief Matt Rosoff and Systems Editor Tobias Mann to pick apart this haystack of earnings news to look for the bubble popping needle that might be hiding within. Guys, thanks for coming on. Matt Rosoff (00:22) Thank you. Tobias Mann (00:23) Good to be here. Brandon (00:24) REG AD It's been a mess of up and down earnings from big tech this quarter, as reported in the past week. Not all of it seems bad, but despite that, a lot of investors seem pretty worried about the state of things. Matt, you've been watching this closely. Can you break this down and give us an understanding of what the numbers mean for both investors and the state of AI? Matt Rosoff (00:46) It seems as if we are in what often happens toward the final phases of a speculative time in the markets, what might be called a bubble, which is characterized by absolutely wild, insane swings in stock prices. These are not penny stocks; these are humongous massive cap tech stocks. Apple is down 10% today simply because they warned that their next quarter might not be as good as expected because memory and other component prices are so high. You have IBM losing more value in a single day after its last earnings warning than it had lost since Black Monday 1987. You have these massive tech stocks, which represent most of the value of the stock market, acting like penny stocks, and that tends not to be a great sign. That's usually when investors don't know what to make of the current state of things and are trying desperately to figure out where to put their money. There's a lot of tea leaf reading. It has varied widely. Meta, investors didn't like what Meta was saying . Their cash flow decreased dramatically because of the capex spending they're doing to build new data centers. Everybody freaked out on that and there was a big sell-off. Brandon (02:29) It was a massive cap swing, right? They're under a billion dollars in free cash flow. They had $8.5 billion last year at this time. I mean, that's huge. Matt Rosoff (02:37) Yeah, and this is all data centers to build out something to do with AI. I think probably in the end, Mark Zuckerberg at Meta has figured they will build as much as they can now, and the AI will help target ads and help their core business enough that it'll be worth it, and they can rent out whatever excess capacity they have in the future. But that is speculation. Brandon (03:06) REG AD Right. Matt Rosoff (03:06) Point being, this is a situation where a lot of investors seem to be reading tea leaves. Amazon is up 15% today. Same story there: their capex and estimates went up. But because AWS grew faster than expected and because investors were looking at Amazon Web Services and their core business, they decided Amazon is doing the smart thing by investing in AI. If you read Corey Quinn, an analyst who writes for us about AWS – his main job is helping customers figure out AWS licensing and pricing – he dug into the earnings and part of what investors liked was AWS margins, but some of that margin was created by hedging on energy prices. It's very obtuse. All the big companies do these kinds of things; their treasury departments are always figuring out how to play games and maximize. It's perfectly legal and not fraud, or anything close to that, but it's not the core business. You have to back out this one-time energy price hedging strategy that worked to their advantage. Then you see that their margins are right where they were expected to be. Brandon (04:33) Right. And I think he even mentioned that they said in that earnings call that they don't expect that to have the same bump in Q3; it's not going to be there next quarter. Matt Rosoff (04:43) And yet investors are throwing money into Amazon, which is up 15% today. It's bonkers. The big chip stocks had huge crashes earlier this month. There was a hedge fund, Situational Awareness created by a young hedge fund manager who worked for FTX, which you'll remember was Sam Bankman-Fried's crypto company that imploded after fraud charges. He created this hedge fund... Brandon (05:21) Now it's imploding. Matt Rosoff (05:22) It's imploding. The take is that he's a decent stock picker but didn't hedge properly and was way over-leveraged. So $45 billion turns into $10 billion. These are the kinds of things you see as a bubble starts to burst. I've seen a lot of memes on the AI forums I follow, many in the AI community say "AGI is already here, we just don't realize it yet." I would counter that "the AI bubble pop is already here, we just don't realize it yet." Brandon (06:01) Speaking of Corey's story, I was digging into that earlier today and was struck by things he pointed out. Aside from the margin bit, he mentioned how AWS discussed their chip business, which Tobias knows doesn't really sell any chips, they actually conflated their chip revenue with EC2 instance revenue. The same thing happened with their massive investment in Anthropic. They accounted for $53.4 billion due to deals with Anthropic last quarter. He said if you follow one Anthropic dollar through the earnings release, it's counted in AI business revenue, chips business, and AWS segment revenue. He said all this massaging and padding is in service of the massive capital expenditures that Amazon and other companies are undertaking. Another quote I thought was telling: "The demand underwriting two hundred and twenty billion in capex is concentrated today in a handful of AI labs, one of which Amazon happens to own a meaningful piece of, when the broader menterprise adoption wave remains a forecast. Matt Rosoff (07:25) Exactly. Brandon (07:26) As I'm reading this, by the end of that story, I was struck with the question: is this entire quarter of earnings just an industry trying to pump air into this thing to stave off a collapse? Matt Rosoff (07:44) I don't know if it's so much trying to pump air as it is the bet that has been made, and they are continuing to make this bet because it would be too risky to pull out. Tobias Mann (07:58) It's like the sunk cost fallacy. Brandon (08:01) Say it again, Tobias. Tobias Mann (08:02) It's like the sunk cost fallacy. They're too deep in at this point to climb out. Brandon (08:04) Yeah, that might be more the case than pumping air in. Tobias Mann (08:09) There's not much they can do other than keep putting money into this. Imagine if next quarter Amazon stopped and said they were not going to spend any more money on capex for this; imagine how the market would react. Brandon (08:27) Yeah, probably not well. Matt Rosoff (08:29) Right. And the fundamental