메뉴
BL
TechCrunch AI • 32일 전

'세상이 준비됐다': OpenAI 프로덕트 총괄 티보 소티오 인터뷰

IMP
7/10
핵심 요약

OpenAI의 핵심 프로덕트 총괄 티보 소티오가 ChatGPT Work 출시 배경과 철학을 설명했다. 코딩 에이전트의 힘을 기술자가 아닌 일반 사무직 사용자에게 확장하는 것이 목표이며, 최대한 단순하고 자연스러운 인터페이스로 모델이 스스로 능력을 발휘하게 하는 것이 제품 설계 철학이라고 밝혔다.

번역된 본문

OpenAI의 소프트웨어 엔지니어링 도구 Codex 사용자라면 티보 소티오를 제품이 성장 마일스톤을 달성할 때마다 토큰 한도를 초기화해주는 사람으로 알고 있을 것이다. 이제 OpenAI는 그런 '도파민'을 모두에게 전하려고 한다. 화이트칼라 노동자들이 AI 에이전트를 활용할 수 있는 플랫폼인 ChatGPT Work가 바로 그것이다. 나는 이 제품과 그 과제를 다룬 기사를 위해 소티오와 대화했고, 독자들과 더 많은 이야기를 나누고 싶었다. 다음은 회의론자 설득, '발견'이라는 제품 디자인 철학, 지능의 비용에 대한 인터뷰를 가볍게 편집·압축한 내용이다.

테크크런치: 당신은 기술 직군 소속으로 알고 있다. Codex와 Work의 프로덕트 리더라고 하는 게 맞나?

소티오: 나는 모든 핵심 프로덕트를 이끌고 있다. API, 에이전트 인프라, 엔터프라이즈, ChatGPT 전체(여기에는 ChatGPT Work와 기존 ChatGPT가 포함된다), 그리고 Codex 전부를 담당한다.

Q: 그레그 브록man에게 보고하는 것으로 이해하면 되나?

소티오: 맞다, 그레그다. 결국 모두가 그레그에게 보고한다고 말하곤 한다.

Q: ChatGPT Work는 OpenAI에 왜 그렇게 중요한가?

소티오: 우리는 코딩 에이전트의 힘을 모두에게 전달하고자 했다. 기술 전문가를 위해 만들어진 것을 안전하고 즐겁게 사용할 수 있는 방식으로 포장하고, 모바일과 웹에서 이동 중에도 쓸 수 있게 하며, 가능한 한 폭넓은 사람들에게 제공하는 작업이었다. 그래서 월 20달러뿐인 Plus 플랜에 포함해 출시했고, 거기서 얻는 가치는 정말 놀라운 수준이다. 우리가 추구한 것은 '이 기술을 최대한 많은 사람에게 제공하자'는 것이었다.

Q: 애널리스트들은 OpenAI가 사용자와의 애플리케이션 관계를 직접 소유해야 한다는 중요한 경제적 동기가 있다고 말한다.

소티오: 사용자에게 더 많은 가치와 유용성을 만들어줄수록, 사람들은 그 유용성에 대해 더 기꺼이 비용을 지불할 것이다. ChatGPT를 늘 그렇게 봐왔다. 사용자에게 너무나 큰 유용성을 주면 사용자는 '당연히 월 20달러를 낼 수밖에 없다'고 느끼게 된다. 얻는 가치가 그보다 훨씬 크다는 걸 알기 때문이다.

Q: AI에 대한 여론을 설득한다는 측면에서 이 기술은 얼마나 중요할 수 있나?

소티오: 내 관점은 이렇다. 우리는 이 기술을 모두와 함께 가져가야 할 역할이 있고, 그래서 '어떻게 확산시킬 것인가'라는 문제가 있다. Codex는 관대한 기술 사용자층을 위해 만들어졌고, 우리는 이런 기능들을 아주 초기부터 제공해왔다. 이제는 기술 성숙도가 훨씬 광범위한 사용자층에 확산할 적절한 단계에 이르렀다고 판단한다. 그리고 모두에게 알려야 한다… 이것은 글쓰기 도움이나 개인적 조언을 얻는 것 이상이다. 이 새로운 국면에서 ChatGPT는 아주 복잡한 작업 전체를 안전하고 즐거운 방식으로 완전히 자율적으로 수행할 수 있다. OpenAI의 미션은 모두를 함께 데려가는 것이다.

TC: 모델이 주도하게 두는 타이밍과, 버튼이나 사용자 인터페이스를 사람들 앞에 제시하는 타이밍은 어떻게 판단하나?

소티오: 우리가 하려는 것의 본질은 극도로 유능한 모델을 만들고, 그것을 삶에 가져오는 가장 단순하고 즐거운 방법을 찾아 막대한 유용성을 얻게 하는 것이다. 그러려면 거의 모델의 방향에서 비켜서서, 모델이 스스로 표현하게 하고 제공할 수 있는 모든 유용성을 끌어낼 수 있어야 한다. … 최소한의 제품 표면, 즐거운 단순함, 매우 자연스러운 방식으로 인간과 소통하는 것. 이전에는 텍스트가 있었고, 이제는 크게 성장 중인 ChatGPT Voice(음성)를 출시했다. 그냥 말로 대화하는 것이 지극히 자연스럽지 않은가. 우리가 지금 대화하는 것처럼, 자연스럽게 대화를 이어가는 것이다.

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Users of OpenAI's software engineering tool Codex might know Thibault Sottiaux as the guy who resets their token limits whenever the product hits a growth milestone. Now, OpenAI is trying to bring that dopamine hit to the rest of us with ChatGPT Work, a platform for white collar workers to leverage AI agents. I spoke to Sottiaux for our feature on the product and its challenges, but we wanted to share more of that conversation with our readers. Here's a lightly edited and condensed version of our interview about winning over skeptics, discovery as a product design philosophy, and the cost of intelligence. TechCrunch: I know you're a member of the technical staff. Is it right to say that you're the product lead for Codex and Work? Sottiaux: I lead all of core products—that is API, agent infrastructure, enterprise, all of ChatGPT, which includes ChatGPT Work, but also ChatGPT classic, and then everything that is Codex as well. Q: Am I right in thinking you report to Greg Brockman? Sottiaux: Yeah, Greg. I like to say that everyone reports to Greg at the end of the day. Q: Why is ChatGPT Work so important to OpenAI? Sottiaux: We wanted to bring the power of coding agents to everyone, and so this is an exercise in taking something that was made for technical people, and then packaging it in a way that is like safe and delightful to use, but also you can use on the go on mobile, on web, and making it available to as broad of a population as possible. This is why we launched it as part of the Plus plan as well, which is only $20 a month, and the amount of value you get out of it is quite incredible. So it's like that's like what we were pursuing. It's like “make this technology available to the broadest population possible.” Q: Analysts say that there's an important economic motivation here, that OpenAI needs to own the application relationship with the user. Sottiaux: The more value and the more utility that we generate for users, the more they will be willing to also pay for some part of that utility, and that's how we've always seen ChatGPT as well. It’s like I'm bringing so much utility to you as a user that you just sort of sit there and you're like, "of course I want to pay $20 bucks a month for this," because you know the value that you get is so much more. Q: How important could this technology be, in terms of winning over public opinion towards AI? Sottiaux: The way that I view it is, we have a role in bringing everyone along with this technology, and so there's this: how do you do diffusion? Codex was built for a forgiving technical audience, where we were making some of these capabilities available very early on, and now we are at a level of maturity of this technology where we feel it is the right step to diffuse it to a much broader audience, and then teach everyone … this is much more than getting help on writing or getting help on some personal advice. In this new factor, ChatGPT can actually do entire very complicated tasks for you all autonomously in a way that is delightful and safe. The mission of OpenAI is to bring everyone along. TC: How you think about that transition and when the moment is right to let the model take the lead versus putting buttons or a user interface in front of people? Sottiaux: The essence of what we're trying to do is building extremely capable models, and then figuring out the most simple and delightful way to bring them into your life so that you get tremendous utility from it. And in order to do that, you need to get out of the way, almost, of the model, and you need to just let it express itself and be able to harness all of the utility that it can provide to you. … [A] minimal product surface, just delightful simplicity, a way to engage with humans that is very natural. We had text before, but now we've launched ChatGPT Voice , which has seen a lot of growth. It is super natural to just talk to it, right? The way that we're talking now, just have an engaging conversation. The progression of this technology is going to become more natural over time. It adapts to humans. You don't have to do the reverse, where you have to learn how to use this application. TC: Is the model there? I was reading Ethan Mollick, who is a Wharton professor who studies these tools, saying that ChatGPT Work tries to be magic, and Claude Cowork puts A/B tests in front of you and has you make more choices. Do you think workers generally are ready for that level of magic? Sottiaux: We definitely see that the world seems to be ready. This is why we've had incredible adoption. We just announced, we hit 20 million users. We managed to launch it in a way that is … simple but powerful, simple but uncompromising. TC: My brain kind of breaks when I think about building a product that's meant to do everything. Do you think about a minimum viable product? Do you think about discrete problems? What are you evaluating? Sottiaux: It is almost like a product of discovery as well. As we push on the frontier of capabilities of models, we also discover what it's capable of, and we sort then lean into the things that it is the most capable of, and then you know build great products around it. There’s this element of discovery of the capabilities as well, including for us. And that's always a very magical, fun experience. For example, GPT 5.6 was a step up in general work: being able to process a large amount of documents, generating quality slides, generating quality reports, doing deep research, things that a professional will do. We then lean into that, and then we capture feedback, and then we continue to improve. And this is also part of iterative deployment of these capabilities. It's learning from the community, learning from real use, and then continuously improving it. TC: There's a big gap between what I'm paying on the Plus plan and the amount of tokens I'm using. How do you think that plays out? Should I be worried about that? Should CFOs be worried about that? Sottiaux: We are working every day to push the frontier on efficiency. We announced major price cuts with Luna, 80% off. This is a permanent price correction… so the current level of frontier capabilities become cheaper and cheaper over time. This is something that will continue. Our goal is to, over time, include more utility in the same dollar amount. So if you want to do more, you know, it's like of course you can pay more to do more, but in terms of what is capable today, it's like you wake up six months from now, you should be able to do all of the same with less spend. TC: What do you say to someone who is stressed out about giving it access to their e-mail, giving it access to iMessages , which you just rolled out today? Sottiaux: It's important to pick models that are safe and aligned. And a very, very big part of our investment is in the safety stack, the safety approach, publishing honest benchmarks on these things. And our models are world-class at these topics. Topics AI , Exclusive When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. Tim Fernholz Senior Reporter Tim Fernholz is a journalist who writes about technology, finance and public policy. He has closely covered the rise of the private space industry and is the author of Rocket Billionaires: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and the New Space Race. Formerly, he was a senior reporter at Quartz, the global business news site, for more than a decade, and began his career as a political reporter in Washington, D.C. You can contact or verify outreach from Tim by emailing tim.fernholz@techcrunch.com or via an encrypted message to tim_fernholz.21 on Signal. View Bio October 13 - 15 San Francisco In less than 48 hours, your chance to save up to $300 on your tickets will end! REGISTER NOW Most Popular Two years after launch, Walmart's Flipkart is closing in on India's quick-commerce leaders Jagmeet Singh Inherent, founded by DeepMind alu
관련 소식