메뉴
HN
Hacker News 21일 전

젤리를 벽에 못 박기: 과연 가능할까? (2005)

IMP
2/10
핵심 요약

영국의 한 연구자가 '젤리를 벽에 못 박는다'는 불가능에 비유되는 속담의 진위를 과학적으로 증명하기 위해 흥미로운 실험을 진행했습니다. 농축된 젤리 큐브는 그 자체로 벽에 들러붙어 못 박기가 가능했지만, 규정대로 물을 섞어 만든 일반 젤리는 끈적한 젤리의 특성상 못에 전혀 버티지 못하고 계속 미끄러져 내려갔습니다. 이 글은 해커뉴스에서 재조명된 고전 유머 실험글로, 엄밀한 실험 설계와 고풍스러운 문체로 단단한 물체가 아닌 대상을 고정하는 물리적 한계를 유쾌하게 보여줍니다.

번역된 본문

젤리를 벽에 못 박기: 과연 가능할까? 우리는 모두 매우 어렵거나 불가능한 임무를 묘사할 때 "젤리를 벽에 못 박는 것 같다"는 옛말을 들어본 적이 있을 것입니다. 하지만 이 작업의 난이도에 대한 우리의 인식은 정당한 걸까요? 실제로 누군가 젤리를 벽에 못 박아보려고 시도해 본 적이 있을까요? 이 실험에서 나는 이 오래된 속담의 타당성을 어느 쪽으로든 확립하고자 시도합니다.

준비물 나는 세인즈버리(Sainsbury's)와 포커스(Focus)에서 다음과 같은 재료를 구입했습니다. 16온스 뽑음못 망치 1자루, 3인치(75mm) 둥근 철사못 200g 한 봉지, 하틀리(Hartley's) 젤리 큐브 135g 팩 여러 개, 그리고 약 850x200x18mm(약 33½"x7¾"x¾") 크기의 나무 판자입니다. 이 나무 판자는 '벽' 역할을 하게 됩니다. 나무의 종류나 정확한 크기는 중요하지 않습니다. 대신 못의 길이는 매우 중요합니다. 구체적으로 말하자면, 못은 젤리 틀로 사용할 그릇의 깊이보다 길어야 합니다. 그래야만 못이 완성된 젤리를 완전히 꿰뚫고 벽(나무판자)에 박힐 수 있으며, 못이 먼저 젤리 안으로 쏙 들어가 버리는 일을 막을 수 있습니다. 아래 사진은 앞서 언급한 젤리 틀(일반적인 디저트 볼)과 크기를 비교하기 위해 그 옆에 놓은 못 하나를 보여줍니다.

첫 번째 시도 슈퍼마켓에서 구입한 젤리 한 상자에는 서로 연결된 12개의 '큐브'가 들어 있습니다. 아래 사진은 오렌지 맛 큐브입니다. 이것은 '고농축' 또는 '원액' 상태의 젤리입니다. 즉, 물을 추가해 비로소 실제 젤리가 만들어지는 형태입니다. 당연히 이 큐브들은 물을 섞어 만든 혼합물보다 점도가 훨씬 높습니다. 따라서 일반 젤리보다 이 농축 큐브를 벽에 못 박는 것이 더 쉬울 것입니다. 사실, 이 큐브는 벽에 고정시키기 위해 못조차 필요하지 않았습니다. 그냥 벽에 착 들러붙었습니다. 확실하게 하기 위해 큐브에 못을 하나 박아보았습니다. 젤리는 제자리를 굳건히 지켰습니다. 하지만 이른바 '속임수(cheating)'라 불리는 행동입니다.

젤리 만들기 첫 번째 시도가 속담의 본래 취지에 좀 어긋난다고 생각되어, 이번에는 제대로 된 젤리로 실험을 반복하기로 결정했습니다. 젤리 큐브로 젤리를 만드는 과정은 젤리 상자 뒷면에 설명되어 있으며, 여기에 그 요약을 소개합니다. 아래 사진은 필요한 장비를 보여줍니다. 젤리 큐브(이번엔 라임 맛), 계량 주전자, 끓는 물입니다. 아무리 맛있어 보여도 원액 젤리 큐브를 먹지 마세요. 엄청나게 달고 아마 중독성이 있을 겁니다. 다 먹어버리면 실험을 할 재료가 남지 않을 테니까요. 끓는 물 0.5파인트(284ml)를 주전자에 붓고 큐브를 넣습니다. 큐브가 모두 녹을 때까지 아무렇게나 마구 찌릅니다. 그런 다음 찬물 0.5파인트를 추가하여 주전자에 1파인트(568ml)의 젤리 액체가 담기게 합니다. 이 젤리를 벽에 못 박을 생각이라면, 더 단단하고 견고한 혼합물을 만들기 위해 설명서보다 물을 적게 넣으면 직관적으로 더 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있을지도 모릅니다. 하지만 이 실험에서는 공정한 테스트를 보장하기 위해 패키지 지시대로 젤리를 준비할 것입니다. 젤리 액체를 젤리 틀로 사용할 용기에 붓습니다. 이 경우 앞서 언급한 대로 일반 디저트 볼을 사용합니다. 사용하는 틀의 종류에 대한 유일한 제한은 깊이가 못의 길이보다 얕아야 한다는 것입니다. 이 실험을 똑같이 재현해 본다면, 틀을 가득 채운 후 주전자에 아주 적은 양의 젤리 액체가 짜증 나게 남아있는 것을 발견할 것입니다. 이 얄미는 양의 젤리는 유리잔에 따르고 볼과 함께 냉장고에 넣으세요. 최고의 혼란을 위해 하숙집 룸메이트들에게는 이 사실을 절대 말하지 마세요. 마지막으로 젤리가 굳도록 하룻밤 동안 그대로 둡니다.

벽에 못 박기 젤리가 다 굳고 나면, 접시로 덮은 뒤 전체 장치를 뒤집고 조심스럽게 볼을 들어냅니다. 그러고는 젤리가 여전히 볼에 들러붙어 있다는 것을 깨닫게 됩니다. 숟가락으로 볼을 몇 번 두드려 보고(아무 소용이 없습니다), 얇고 날카로운 칼로 젤리 가장자리를 공격해 떼어냅니다. 논리적인 다음 단계는 젤리를 집어 들고 바닥과 수직인 표면에 못 박는 것입니다. 불행하게도, 그 첫 번째 시도 중...

원문 보기
원문 보기 (영어)
Nailing jelly to a wall: is it possible? We've all heard the old saying "it's like nailing jelly to a wall" to describe a task that is very difficult or impossible. But is our view of the difficulty of this task justified? Has anybody actually tried nailing jelly to a wall? In this experiment I attempt to establish, one way or the other, the validity of the old proverb. Home Materials I sourced the following materials from Sainsbury's and Focus. They are: a 16oz claw hammer, a 200g pack of 3" (75mm) round wire nails, a selection of 135g packs of Hartley's jelly cubes, and a plank of wood, dimensions 850x200x18mm (approx. 33½"x7¾"x¾"). The plank of wood will play the part of the "wall". The type of wood, and its exact dimensions, are not important. The length of the nails is important. Specifically, the nails should be longer than the depth of the bowl intended for use as the jelly mould. This is to enable the nail to go right through the finished jelly and into the wall without the nail first disapparing into the jelly. The picture below shows the proposed jelly mould (an ordinary dessert bowl) and one of the nails next to it for comparison purposes. A first attempt A box of jelly, as purchased from the supermarket, contains twelve joined "cubes". The orange flavour is shown below. This is "concentrated" or "neat" jelly; the idea is that water is added to produce actual jelly. Of course, these cubes are much more viscous than the diluted mixture produced by adding water. Therefore, it should be easier to nail the concentrated cubes to the wall than the actual jelly. In fact, the jelly didn't even need a nail to stay on the wall. It just stuck there. For good measure, I drove a nail through it. The jelly held in place. This is called "cheating". Making the jelly My first attempt being somewhat against the spirit of the proverb, I decided to repeat the experiment with proper jelly. The procedure for making jelly from the jelly cubes is documented on the reverse of the jelly boxes; a summary is given here. The picture below shows the equipment required: some jelly cubes (lime this time), a measuring jug, and some boiling water. Do not eat any of the neat jelly cubes, no matter how nice they look. They're incredibly sweet and probably addictive; if you eat them all you won't have any left for the experiment. Pour half a pint (284ml) of boiling water into a jug, and add the cubes. Stab the cubes indiscriminately until they've all dissolved. Then add another half pint of cold water, so the jug contains a pint (568ml) of jelly mix. Given that the intention is that this jelly be nailed to a wall, we might intuitively get better results if we add less water than required, in order to give a thicker and presumably sturdier mix. However, in this experiment the jelly will be prepared according to the instructions on the packet to ensure a fair test. Pour the jelly mix into whatever is being used for the jelly mould. In this case, as mentioned before, we are using a simple dessert bowl. The only restriction on the type of mould used is that its depth should be less than the length of the nails. If you reproduce this experiment, you will probably find that there is an irritatingly small amount of jelly mixture left over in the jug once the mould is full. Pour this footling amount of jelly into a glass, and place it in the fridge alongside the bowl. For maximum confusion, don't tell any of your housemates about it. Finally, leave the jelly to set overnight. Nailing it to a wall When the jelly has set, cover it with a plate, upturn the entire arrangement, and carefully lift the bowl off the jelly. Then realise that the jelly is still stuck to the bowl. Hit the bowl with a spoon a few times (to no avail) before attacking the edges of the jelly with a thin sharp knife to loosen it. The logical next step would be to pick up the jelly and nail it to some surface perpendicular to the floor. Unfortunately, the first of these steps was impossible; trying to pick up the jelly with bare hands resulted in its partial disintegration. So, I opted for a compromise; I got the jelly back in the bowl, and upturned it directly onto the plank, while it was horizontal. With the plank horizontal, I drove a nail through the centre of the jelly and into the plank. I then added a few more nails to hold the jelly in place. Unfortunately, even with nine nails in it, the jelly was starting to break around the nails when the plank was tilted. Seeing nothing better to do, I added three more nails at strategic points. When the plank was tilted, half the jelly broke off completely and fell to the floor. The weak points seemed to be near the nails. The jelly's structural integrity now having been seriously compromised, the rest of the jelly followed about half a minute later. This attempt at nailing jelly to a wall had therefore resulted in quite a convincing failure. But wait... I suddenly remembered that I had more jelly. The glass into which I poured the excess from the jug was still sitting in the fridge. I retrieved it and extricated the jelly. Perhaps a smaller amount of jelly would nail to the wall easier? Taking no chances, I not only nailed the jelly to the plank using five nails, but also added a crescent of eight nails below the jelly to catch any wayward lumps. This worked for approximately half a minute. Unfortunately, although the jelly that fell off was briefly caught in the crescent arrangement of nails, it fell through the gaps after a small amount of time. Before long, there were only trace amounts of jelly left on the wall. Conclusion Given some jelly mixed according to standard procedures and a vertical wall, it is not possible to nail the former to the latter and have it stay there for any significant amount of time. Furthermore, these experiments were conducted by nailing the jelly to a horizontal surface which was then gradually tilted. Nailing jelly to a wall while the wall is vertical is an intractable problem in itself due to the difficulty in picking up jelly with the hands without it disintegrating. Even using many nails to construct a receptacle for the purpose of catching the jelly, which is not technically "nailing it to the wall", resulted in failure. This was because the gaps between the nails afford to the jelly an easy means of egress from the receptacle. Further research into the area might involve the nailing to the wall of a stronger jelly mix. Alternatively, the "wall" could be placed, nails first, into the jelly while it's setting, to allow the jelly to set around the nails. Then in the morning the bowl can be removed, leaving the jelly nailed to the wall. The old proverb, then, is justified, and the reader may say that an impossible or near-impossible task is "like nailing jelly to the wall" safe in the knowledge that the assertion has some scientific evidence to corroborate it. Stuff that's been added afterwards I conducted this experiment as a little diversion in the lazy few weeks between finishing my final year exams at university and graduating, back in June 2005. Since then, there have been various developments, summarised here as they happen. 26th October 2006: Attention Americans! What you call "jello", we call "jelly". What you call "jelly", we call "jam". That's the long and the short of it. However, I've recently been sent a correction, and I wouldn't be a proper pedant if I didn't address it. Michael writes on the comments page that "Jell-O" is in fact a brand name, even though it is often used generically. He also tells us that the jelly-jam thing isn't so simple - what they call "jelly" in the US is a gelatin-based food spread, and what they call "jam" is a fruit preserve, which is also what we call jam in the UK. So apparently, "jam" means the same thing in both countries. 5th February 2007 I wrote the above "Attention Americans" update in October. It's now February, and a link to this page has recently been posted on